2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2789(02)00586-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of observational noise on the recurrence quantification analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of an appropriate value for the threshold can be made by taking into account the influence of the observational noise that could affect the experimental measures and the minimum distance between the trajectories of the two 4 Complexity systems. In general, choosing equal to few percent of the maximum phase space diameter could ensure a sufficient number of structures in the cross recurrence plot [27], while the appearance of artifacts could be avoided by considering the signal-to-noise ratio for the underlying physical systems [28].…”
Section: Synchronization Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selection of an appropriate value for the threshold can be made by taking into account the influence of the observational noise that could affect the experimental measures and the minimum distance between the trajectories of the two 4 Complexity systems. In general, choosing equal to few percent of the maximum phase space diameter could ensure a sufficient number of structures in the cross recurrence plot [27], while the appearance of artifacts could be avoided by considering the signal-to-noise ratio for the underlying physical systems [28].…”
Section: Synchronization Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained m = 5.2 ± 0.75 and = 1.4 ± 0.66, so the embedded parameters were set to = 6 and = 1. Following the criteria reported in [27,28], we identified the range [1.2-1.8] for the threshold . The analysis was carried out with the average value of the range, setting = 1.5.…”
Section: Crp Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold value has been selected in such a way that the point density was approximately 1%. 36 The changes in the character of the time series are clearly reflecting different regimes of dynamics of the plasma oscillations. (Fig.…”
Section: Rqa Of Plasma Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several "rules of thumb" for the choice of the threshold ε are present in the literature between them (Marwan et al, 2007): a/ it should not exceed 10% of the mean or the maximum phase space diameter (Koebbe and Mayer-Kress, 1992;Zbilut and Webber, 1992) b/ it should be such that the recurrence point density in RP is approximately 1% c/ in order to avoid problem related to noise, ε has to be chosen such that it is five time larger than the standard deviation of the observational noise, i.e. ε>5σ (Thiel et al, 2002) Nevertheless, the choice of e depends strongly on the considered system under study.…”
Section: Selection Of the Threshold Or Cutoff Value εmentioning
confidence: 99%