2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nutrient conditions on the transport of bacteria in saturated porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influent of the filtration experiments was freshly prepared before each batch of experiment by adding an aliquot of the E. coli stock solution into sterilized deionized (DI) water to provide an E. coli concentration of ∼1.5 × 10 5 CFU/mL, which was within the typical concentration range in contaminated water and was consistent with previous studies. 9,25−28 DI water was selected because (1) the natural surface water usually has low ionic strength values (e.g., 10 −2 to 10 mM); 4,5 (2) our previous findings suggested that a suspension of E. coli cells in reduced ionic strength conditions over a relatively short period of time would not alter their viability and cell properties such as size; 29,30 and (3) since low ionic strength generally leads to minimal cell attachment, 31,32 the use of DI water would minimize the potential removal of E. coli cells through adsorption and thus would allow for a better investigation of their removal via the physical process of straining. Concentrations of E. coli in stock solution, as well as in the influent and effluent during filtration experiments, were determined via the plate counting method using mTEC agar plates, according to USEPA Method 1103.1.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influent of the filtration experiments was freshly prepared before each batch of experiment by adding an aliquot of the E. coli stock solution into sterilized deionized (DI) water to provide an E. coli concentration of ∼1.5 × 10 5 CFU/mL, which was within the typical concentration range in contaminated water and was consistent with previous studies. 9,25−28 DI water was selected because (1) the natural surface water usually has low ionic strength values (e.g., 10 −2 to 10 mM); 4,5 (2) our previous findings suggested that a suspension of E. coli cells in reduced ionic strength conditions over a relatively short period of time would not alter their viability and cell properties such as size; 29,30 and (3) since low ionic strength generally leads to minimal cell attachment, 31,32 the use of DI water would minimize the potential removal of E. coli cells through adsorption and thus would allow for a better investigation of their removal via the physical process of straining. Concentrations of E. coli in stock solution, as well as in the influent and effluent during filtration experiments, were determined via the plate counting method using mTEC agar plates, according to USEPA Method 1103.1.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by two approaches: The first is the consequence of the "salting-out effect" whereby the solubility of proteins decreased with salt concentration [30,35,36]. The second is the result of the hydration effect occurring when the concentration was significantly high (i.e., 1 M NaCl) [38,39]. The maximum value of removal turbidity efficiency (91.07%) was obtained for the coagulant agent extracted with a 0.5 M NaCl solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Coagulant Dosage On Turbidity Removal Efficiency Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposition of bacterial cells in geomedia appears to be affected by (1) microbial properties including surface charge [6], hydrophobicity [7, 8], bacterial size and shape [9], growth phase [10], motility [11], nutrition condition [12], chemotaxis [13], metabolic activity [14], and composition of the cell surface (e.g., lipopolysaccharide, extracellular polymeric substances, outer membrane proteins, flagella and fimbriae) [1519], (2) soil properties including soil particles size and surface properties [17, 20], mineral content [21], moisture content [7] and organic matter or nutrients content [22, 23], (3) environmental factors including ionic strength and ion valence [24, 25], pH [26] and temperature [27]. In addition, hydraulic conditions such as flow velocity [28, 29], input microbial concentration [30] and heterogeneity of microbial populations [6] also play a role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%