Influence of Novel SrTiO3/MnO2 Hybrid Nanoparticles on Poly(methyl methacrylate) Thermal and Mechanical Behavior

Abstract

While dental poly methyl methacrylate(PMMA) possesses distinctive qualities such as ease of fabrication, cost-effectiveness, and favorable physical and mechanical properties, these attributes alone are inadequate to impart the necessary impact strength and hardness. Consequently, pure PMMA is less suitable for dental applications. This research focused on the incorporation of Strontium titanate (SrTiO3-STO) and hybrid filler STO/Manganese oxide (MnO2) to improve impact resistance and hardness. The potential of STO in reinforcing PMMA is poorly investigated, while hybrid filler STO/MnO2 has not been presented yet. Differential scanning calorimetry is conducted in order to investigate the agglomeration influence on the PMMA glass transition temperature (Tg), as well as the leaching of residual monomer and volatile additives that could pose a threat to human health. It has been determined that agglomeration with 1 wt% loading had no influence on Tg, while the first scan revealed differences in evaporation of small molecules, in favor of composite PMMA-STO/MnO2, which showed the trapping potential of volatiles. Investigations of mechanical properties have revealed the significant influence of hybrid STO/MnO2 filler on microhardness and total absorbed impact energy, which were increased by 89.9% and 145.4%, respectively. Results presented in this study revealed the reinforcing potential of hybrid nanoparticles that could find application in other polymers as well.

Correlation between Agglomerates Hausdorff Dimension and Mechanical Properties of Denture Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Composites

“…As can be seen, the shape and size of the agglomerates in PMMA-SrTiO3, PMMA-MnO2 and SrTiO3/MnO2 vary, with different toughening mechanisms observed at the fracture surface. In our previous research, it was shown that the synergy between SrTiO3 and MnO2 resulted in an improved mechanical performance compared to both the pure PMMA and PMMA-SrTiO3 composite [18]. This was a consequence of the reduced agglomeration and better distribution of ceramic particles within the polymer matrix.…”

“…SrTiO 3 , MnO 2 and SrTiO 3 /MnO 2 were incorporated into a dental PMMA matrix. SrTiO 3 /MnO 2 nanoparticles were prepared by the previously published procedure, with a particle concentration of 1 wt% in all composites [18]. The scheme presented in Figure 1 shows the experimental procedure for composite preparation.…”