2018
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2017.1399936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nonlinear turbulent friction on the system frequency response in transient pipe flow modelling and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, only the linearized steady friction is included in the following numerical applications. The nonlinear steady friction and unsteady friction (Meniconi et al 2014) can be also included using a method similar to the one presented in Duan et al (2018).…”
Section: Further Application and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, only the linearized steady friction is included in the following numerical applications. The nonlinear steady friction and unsteady friction (Meniconi et al 2014) can be also included using a method similar to the one presented in Duan et al (2018).…”
Section: Further Application and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsteady friction model is applied as well, and, further, decrease of the pressure fluctuation at a higher frequency results. It is noted that the nonlinearity of friction model is still a challenging factor for the frequency response of 1D water hammer when applied to practical problems since the high order terms will make non-negligible contributions at some specific conditions [38][39][40]. Duan et al [39] proposed a two-step analytical extension for the friction factor to consider the nonlinear turbulent friction term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the nonlinearity of friction model is still a challenging factor for the frequency response of 1D water hammer when applied to practical problems since the high order terms will make non-negligible contributions at some specific conditions [38][39][40]. Duan et al [39] proposed a two-step analytical extension for the friction factor to consider the nonlinear turbulent friction term. The numerical results showed that the contribution of the nonlinear steady friction term to the total frictional damping was highly dependent on the ratio of the generated transient intensity to the initial pipe discharge, which provided a factor to estimate the importance of the nonlinearity on the system frequency response analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capponi et al [38] evaluated the accuracy of frequency domain analysis and discovered linearization error, the mitigation of which requires a correction factor that enables frequency domain analysis to provide a nearly similar output as the method of characteristic (MoC). Duan et al [39] retained non-turbulent friction and provided an assessment of the pipe system under transient flow modeling in the frequency domain of a hydraulic system. As of late, many researches are concerned with crack detection, crack precise location, and the effects of crack and leakage in the pipeline system using the frequency domain as an essential practical approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%