Influence of non-price and environmental sustainability factors on truckload procurement process

Basu, Ron; Subramanian, Nachiappan; Gunasekaran, Angappa; Palaniappan, P.L.K.

doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2170-z

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Zhalechian et al (2016) present a new sustainable closed-loop location-routing-inventory model under mixed uncertainty using a stochastic-possibilistic programming approach. The research about sustainability in the supply chain is also widely discussed (Basu et al, 2015;Basu et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2008).…”

Section: Sustainability Innovation In Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications for pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain

Zhang

Zhi

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Members in a supply chain account for corporate social responsibility (CSR) in different ways. This paper considers a socially responsible supply chain in which the manufacturer innovates in a sustainable product while the retailer exhibits CSR concerns. This paper aims to investigate how socially responsible behavior, namely, sustainable innovations or CSR concerns, affects the pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare, in such a socially responsible supply chain. Design/methodology/approach This paper first constructs an integrated case as a benchmark and then develops a Manufacturer-Stackelberg game in a decentralized scenario. The pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare are confirmed and analyzed in centralized and decentralized cases. Moreover, two unique coordinating contracts, i.e. wholesale price discount contract and revenue-sharing contract, are used in this socially responsible supply chain. Findings Analytical analysis shows that, under certain conditions, the optimal CSR strategies hold for maximizing pure channel profit, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing social welfare. Whether the performance in a centralized case outnumbers that in a decentralized case depends on the CSR concerns level and environment-friendly degree of the product. In addition, it is found that a wholesale price discount contract is better for the retailer whereas a revenue-sharing contract is better for the manufacturer in pure profit to improve coordinating efficiency. Practical implications These results can offer managerial implications to the socially responsible supply chain in terms of pricing decisions, CSR strategies and sustainability innovations. Specifically, under certain conditions, placing more CSR concerns level increases pure channel profit and the social welfare. A balance between the pure profit and the social welfare is hereby achieved for the two socially responsible individuals by designing a proper contract. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is among the first studies so far to combine the CSR concerns strategy and sustainability innovation into a socially responsible supply chain.

show abstract

Section: Sustainability Innovation In Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications for pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain

Zhang

Zhi

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Auction (Ağralı et al, 2008), (Alp et al, 2003), (Andres Figliozzi et al, 2003), (Jothi Basu et al, 2017), (Berger and Bierwirth, 2010), (Buer and Kopfer, 2014), (Buer and Pankratz, 2010), (Caplice, 2007), (Caplice and Sheffi, 2003), (Carter et al, 2004), (Carter and Stevens, 2007), (Chang, 2009), (Chen, 2016), (Chen et al, 2009), (Cheng, 2011), (Cheng et al, 2016), (Dahl and Derigs, 2011), (Figliozzi et al, 2004), (Figliozzi et al, 2005), (Figliozzi et al, 2006), (Figliozzi et al, 2007), (Gansterer and Hartl, 2016), (Garrido, 2007), (Gattiker et al, 2007), (Goldsby and Eckert, 2003), (Guo et al, 2006), (Handoko and Lau, 2016), (Hu et al, 2016), (Huang and Xu, 2013), , , (Kersten, 2009), (Kuo and Miller-Hooks, 2012), (Kuo and Miller-Hooks, 2015), (Kuyzu et al, 2015), (Lalive et al, 2017), (Ledyard et al, 2002), (Lee et al, 2007), (Li and Zhang, 2015), (Li et al, 2016), (Lim et al, 2012), (Lim et al, 2008),…”

Section: Mechanism Typementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Case studies (Ağralı et al, 2008), (Jothi Basu et al, 2017), (Carter and Stevens, 2007), (Hedvall et al, 2017), (Lalive et al, 2017), (Ledyard et al, 2002), (Lim et al, 2012), (Robu et al, 2011), (Sandholm et al, 2006), (Schwind et al, 2009) Literature reviews Numerical experiments (Andres Figliozzi et al, 2003), (Berger and Bierwirth, 2010), (Buer and Pankratz, 2010), (Chang, 2009), (Chen, 2016), (Chen et al, 2009), (Cheng, 2011), (Cheng et al, 2016), (Dahl and Derigs, 2011), (Figliozzi et al, 2004), (Figliozzi et al, 2005), (Figliozzi et al, 2006), (Figliozzi et al, 2007), (Gansterer and Hartl, 2016), (Garrido, 2007), (Guo et al, 2006), (Huang and Xu, 2013), , (Kuo and Miller-Hooks, 2012), (Kuo and Miller-Hooks, 2015), (Lee et al, 2007), (Li et al, 2016), (Lim et al, 2008), (Ma et al, 2010), (Mes et al, 2009), (Mesa-Arango and Ukkusuri, 2013), (Özener et al, 2011), (Qiao et al, 2016), (Qin et al, 2012), (Rekik and Mellouli, 2012), (Remli and Rekik, 2013),…”

Section: Mechanism Typementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce

Lafkihi

Pan

Ballot

2019

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a literature review of freight transportation service procurement and investigates the challenges and opportunities regarding transportation organization and procurement mechanism design in the context of E-commerce. A total of 78 articles published in academic journals between 1998 and 2017 were reviewed. A framework comprising seven classification criteria is proposed to analyze the articles. The results reveal that new business environments challenge the efficiency and effectiveness of the current leading procurement mechanisms. This work also identifies the trends and gaps from the viewpoints of practitioners and researchers and describes future prospects in new freight transportation markets and organizations.

show abstract

“…The majority of papers in SSS came up with grouping models or evaluation techniques that aid in selecting relevant suppliers or/and allocating orders among the suppliers (e.g., [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]). A few other studies developed decision support models for SSE in different sectors of the automotive industry, for instance, in logistics service providers ( [77][78][79]) and spare part suppliers [80]. A different study of this area was that of Govindan et al [81], who combined supply chain network design (SCND) with the order allocation problem in order to minimize procurement costs and environmental impacts of an automobile manufacturer in Iran.…”

Section: Sscm Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The holistic shift from traditional supply chain to sustainable supply chain has been practiced in different industries for many years. The automotive industry, as one of the largest and most influential industries in the world, could have a substantial effect on the movement toward a sustainable society. Despite the growing body of literature in the field of sustainable supply chain management, there is no review article that comprehensively synthesizes the state-of-the-art research in the automotive industry. To cover this gap, this paper reviews the sustainable supply chain management literature in the automotive industry published between 1995 and 2017. A systematic review and content analysis were conducted to collect the studies and analyze their content. The content analysis was structured based upon a set of key business processes following the Integration Definition Function (IDEF0) method, which is a structured approach of analyzing business processes. The study provides a practical guideline for designing a sustainable automotive supply chain and culminates with the outlined research gaps and recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Influence of non-price and environmental sustainability factors on truckload procurement process

Cited by 18 publications

References 37 publications

Implications for pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain

Implications for pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain

Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce

Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About