2015
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1046502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests

Abstract: Of the stationary noises employed, noise with the same spectrum as the speech yielded the best masking. SRT differences across languages and noises could be attributed in part to spectral differences. These findings provide the feasibility and limits of comparing audiological results across languages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the noise masker is modulated, listeners with normal hearing exhibit improved speech recognition (indicated by a reduced SRT) compared with speech recognition in stationary noise (e.g. Festen & Plomp, ; Wagener & Brand, ; Hochmuth et al ., ). This improvement is ascribed to listening into the temporal gaps of the modulated noise masker and thereby to processing speech information that is masked in stationary noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If the noise masker is modulated, listeners with normal hearing exhibit improved speech recognition (indicated by a reduced SRT) compared with speech recognition in stationary noise (e.g. Festen & Plomp, ; Wagener & Brand, ; Hochmuth et al ., ). This improvement is ascribed to listening into the temporal gaps of the modulated noise masker and thereby to processing speech information that is masked in stationary noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover there was no need to use this material in our study as there were no non-native listeners examined. In regards to multi-talker noise, previous studies have demonstrated that fluctuating noise has a similar effect on speech reception thresholds in different language-mutations of tests, tested in matrix sentence tests (Hochmuth et al 2015). In addition, new variations of multi-talker babble, such as the use of competing coordinate response measure sentences, have masking properties similar to other types of multi-talker babble (Humes et al 2017).…”
Section: Influence Of Test Materials On Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on measurements at fixed SNRs covering a broad range of speech intelligibility for each word realization, an optimization of the speech test material can be achieved by attenuating words of high intelligibility and amplifying words of low intelligibility within a limited range. By shifting the respective discrimination function for each item as closely together as possible, the spread of word-specific SRT-values is decreased which increases the slope of the discrimination function for the test lists (according to the model by Kollmeier, 1990, reviewed by Kollmeier et al, 2014). Note that either a 50%-or 80%-definition of the SRT at word level may be employed for optimization, since, e.g., the triplet tests 80% point on a digit level is closer to the 50% point targeted for triplet-scoring in the final test (cf.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though not all existing tests exactly fulfill the specifications as indicated here, these recommendations are the results of a consensus process within the ICRA group. The recommendations for the digit triplet test and the matrix test listed in Table 1 should be selfexplanatory in combination with the review papers by Zokoll et al (2012) and Kollmeier et al (2014), respectively. Nevertheless, the following remarks with respect to the different development steps are given:…”
Section: Icra Recommendations For the Construction Of Multilingual Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation