2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Negotiation, Glide Path, and Preflaring Procedures on Root Canal Shaping—Terminology, Basic Concepts, and a Systematic Review

Abstract: The definition of glide path and preflaring procedures remains controversial. Glide path preparation significantly reduces canal transportation and the risk of debris extrusion. Coronal preflaring increases the accuracy of working length determination and decreases the amount of debris extrusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(175 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the analysis of bias, there are no well-defined criteria to assess the risk of bias in in-vitro studies, and the studies included in the present systematic review were analyzed by adapting prior criteria adopted in other reviews that evaluated in vitro studies [ 19 20 21 ]. Therefore, some methodological features with the potential to introduce some bias to the results were defined a priori.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the analysis of bias, there are no well-defined criteria to assess the risk of bias in in-vitro studies, and the studies included in the present systematic review were analyzed by adapting prior criteria adopted in other reviews that evaluated in vitro studies [ 19 20 21 ]. Therefore, some methodological features with the potential to introduce some bias to the results were defined a priori.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by using adapted criteria for systematic reviews of in vitro studies [ 19 20 21 ]. Therefore, the following criteria were analyzed: similarity of specimens, specimen randomization, accordance with manufacturers' directions, standardization of inoculum, and blinding of outcome assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements from the pre-and postinstrumentation scans at the four locations were made, to the nearest 0.1 mm. e extent of canal transportation was calculated using this formula: (Y1-Y2)−(X1-X2), where Y1 � the shortest distance between the canal's distal wall and the root's distal periphery before instrumentation; Y2 � the shortest distance between the canal's distal wall and the root's distal periphery after instrumentation; X1 � the shortest distance between the canal's mesial wall and the root's mesial periphery before instrumentation; and X2 � the shortest distance between the canal's mesial walls and the root's mesial periphery after instrumentation (Figures 1-3) [13][14][15][16]. For statistical analysis, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to verify that all datasets showed a Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to collect as much data as possible about the anatomy of a particular canal (size, width, presence of narrowing or calcifications) and its geometry (orientation in space and curvature) to standardize the instrumentation plan. The designation of these parts is of paramount importance, since some anatomical features can compromise the safety and effectiveness of the subsequent use of large instruments [9].…”
Section: General Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%