1993
DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.22.5137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nearest neighbor sequence on the stability of base pair mismatches in long DNA: determination by temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis

Abstract: Temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) was employed to determine the thermal stabilities of 48 DNA fragments that differ by single base pair mismatches. The approach provides a rapid way for studying how specific base mismatches effect the stability of a long DNA fragment. Homologous 373 bp DNA fragments differing by single base pair substitutions in their first melting domain were employed. Heteroduplexes were formed by melting and reannealing pairs of DNAs, one of which was 32P-labeled on its 5'-end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
93
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In two samples, we observed different melting curves which were close to but distinct from the mutant curves of the detection probes; after sequencing, these samples were found to have the IVS I-5 and the frame shift mutations, which are less common in the Egyptian population. All genotype results were confirmed by routine methodologies, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in combination with ARMS PCR and direct sequencing [3,11,12] The IVS I-1 mutation gave a Tm mean ± standard deviation of 59.07 ± 0.45° C, the IVS I-6 mutation gave a Tm mean ± standard deviation of 61.34 ± 0.27° C while IVS I-110 mutation gave Tm mean ± standard deviation of 66.96 ± 0.58° C. Here the design of the sensor probes of the IVS 1-1/6 and IVS I-110 takes the advantage of the fact that different mutations placed along the sequence produce distinct effects on the Tm [12] Thus, the melting curves permitted the distinction of the normal allele from IVS 1-1 and IVS 1-6 mutations separated by five nucleotides apart. The melting curves obtained immediately after the amplification procedure permitted the identification of the Tm peaks corresponding to normal or mutated alleles in each sample (fig 2A) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two samples, we observed different melting curves which were close to but distinct from the mutant curves of the detection probes; after sequencing, these samples were found to have the IVS I-5 and the frame shift mutations, which are less common in the Egyptian population. All genotype results were confirmed by routine methodologies, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in combination with ARMS PCR and direct sequencing [3,11,12] The IVS I-1 mutation gave a Tm mean ± standard deviation of 59.07 ± 0.45° C, the IVS I-6 mutation gave a Tm mean ± standard deviation of 61.34 ± 0.27° C while IVS I-110 mutation gave Tm mean ± standard deviation of 66.96 ± 0.58° C. Here the design of the sensor probes of the IVS 1-1/6 and IVS I-110 takes the advantage of the fact that different mutations placed along the sequence produce distinct effects on the Tm [12] Thus, the melting curves permitted the distinction of the normal allele from IVS 1-1 and IVS 1-6 mutations separated by five nucleotides apart. The melting curves obtained immediately after the amplification procedure permitted the identification of the Tm peaks corresponding to normal or mutated alleles in each sample (fig 2A) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The software provided with the equipment (LightCycler 2) gives the temperature of melting (Tm) of the sensor probe. A base pair mismatch between the sensor probe and template causes a decrease in Tm that can be easily detected by the LightCycler [12,13] …”
Section: Real-time Pcr Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the degree of DHPLC pattern abnormality is mainly influenced by the sequences flanking the mismatch rather than by the nature of the mismatch itself. The reason for this phenomenon may lie in neighboring stacking interactions [Ke and Wartell, 1993] and hydrogen bonding between non-Watson-Crick base oppositions such as G-T and G-A [Aboul-ela et al, 1985]. In our study, two pairs of mutations (encoded 35, 34; and 4, 64 in Table 1) provide evidence for a mismatch stabilization effect of flanking bases, both representing neighboring mutations (∆1 bp) which result in different single-base mismatches but in FIGURE 4.…”
Section: Correlation Between Dhplc Profile and Mutation Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No correlation of DHPLC profiles with mutation type was observed. This is expected since the degree of denaturation depends on the nature of both the mismatched and flanking sequences (22,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%