2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-015-5055-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of natural rainfall variability on the evaluation of artificial precipitation enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean relative change (MRC) reflects an annual average estimate of the impact of seeding over the 10-year period and is shown to be positive in all cases-varying from 5.6% at Al Malaiha gauge to 30.8% at Masafi gauge. An average increase of 22.8% is recorded over the target area using Equation (11), which is derived from the mean of target/control observations with the best fit (R 2 = 0.95). Figure 4a shows the inter-annual variability of the relative change ratio throughout the 2010-2019 seeding period at gauges within Target Area 1.…”
Section: Radar-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean relative change (MRC) reflects an annual average estimate of the impact of seeding over the 10-year period and is shown to be positive in all cases-varying from 5.6% at Al Malaiha gauge to 30.8% at Masafi gauge. An average increase of 22.8% is recorded over the target area using Equation (11), which is derived from the mean of target/control observations with the best fit (R 2 = 0.95). Figure 4a shows the inter-annual variability of the relative change ratio throughout the 2010-2019 seeding period at gauges within Target Area 1.…”
Section: Radar-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the most recent review on global precipitation enhancement activities conducted by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Expert Team on Weather Modification, cloud seeding from aircraft platforms is generally considered more effective compared to other techniques such as ground-based generators, customized rockets, and artillery shells [1]. Results from operational cloud seeding programs spanning several countries, including Australia [10], China [11], India [12], Israel [13], South Africa [14][15][16], Thailand [17], and the United States [18,19], record between 10-30% increases in precipitation amounts and cloud lifetime. Alternatively, several studies report on the limited efficacy of seeding experiments for drought relief [20], along with inconclusive results stemming from unreliable measurements and/or co-occurring microphysical and dynamical processes that are difficult to account for [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a statistical test, total N study units are usually divided into two categories (i.e., K seeded units and L unseeded units). The evaluation of a statistical test is influenced by values of these sample sizes together with the catalytic operation, test scheme, and data hierarchy (Manton et al, ; Wang, ; Wu et al, ). When we utilize only the historical unseeded data, K denotes the number of assumed seeded units.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Statistical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It compares the actual value with the estimated natural value with the assumption of no catalysis to establish the corresponding evaluation indicators to analyze the effect of cloud seeding (Breed et al, ; Gabriel, ). Most previous studies selected precipitation to conduct analysis, and the results showed that the relative effects of artificial precipitation enhancement operation are about 5%–45% (e.g., Gabriel & Gagin, ; Gabriel, ; Gagin & Gabriel, ; Griffith & Yorty, ; Jia et al, ; Koloskov et al, ; Li et al, ; Morrison et al, ; Solak et al, ; Xue, Hashimoto, et al, ; Xue, Tessendorf, et al, ; Woodley et al, , ; Wu et al, ; Wurtele, ; Zeng et al, ; Zhai, ; Zhai et al, ). Despite important progress, many critical issues or challenges remain to be solved, such as natural fluctuation of spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation, lacking complete and systematic understanding of the processes of artificial catalysis and physical mechanism of cloud seeding, and limitation of the application of statistical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct observation of ice crystal formation and evolution is one of the most critical issues in supercooled stratus cloud seeding operations. It is still a challenge to distin-guishing between the impacts of cloud seeding and the natural variability of weather systems on the cloud-precipitation process [15], which requires multi-platform simultaneous observations [4,16]. For instance, only two of 36 experiments for seeding effects were confirmed by the research aircraft, radar, and surface instrumentation, mainly due to the natural fluctuations in ice crystal concentrations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%