2018
DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Nanoxides on Diffusivity and Solubility of Hydrogen in Pd-based alloys

Abstract: The hydrogen interaction in palladium alloys with addition of Ce, Zr and Y was studied. These alloys are produced by arc-melting and then cold rolled into thin foils. Heat treatment at 800ºC for 24h in air atmosphere is applied to induce internal oxidation. Hydrogen permeation tests and TDS (Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy) are carried out to evaluate hydrogen interaction with three different microstructures which can be characterized by dislocations, substitutional atoms and nanoxides. For alloys argon anneal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the uncertainty of the diffusion coefficient of H * in Cs2AgBiBr6, it is hard to predict quantitatively the H * distribution concentration in perovskite film. The diffusion coefficient of H * in most materials ranges from 4.910 -15 cm 2 /s to 1.0710 -5 cm 2 /s (Supplementary Table 2) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . So here, to estimate the diffusion coefficient, we first simulated the depth-dependent values at different hydrogenation times (600 s, 1,200 s, 1,800 s, 2,400 s and 3,000 s) based on the selected diffusion coefficients from 110 -15 cm 2 /s to 110 -5 cm 2 /s, as shown in Supplementary…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the uncertainty of the diffusion coefficient of H * in Cs2AgBiBr6, it is hard to predict quantitatively the H * distribution concentration in perovskite film. The diffusion coefficient of H * in most materials ranges from 4.910 -15 cm 2 /s to 1.0710 -5 cm 2 /s (Supplementary Table 2) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . So here, to estimate the diffusion coefficient, we first simulated the depth-dependent values at different hydrogenation times (600 s, 1,200 s, 1,800 s, 2,400 s and 3,000 s) based on the selected diffusion coefficients from 110 -15 cm 2 /s to 110 -5 cm 2 /s, as shown in Supplementary…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%