2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mud cake solidification agents on thickening time of oil well cement and its solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydration mechanism of cement paste with SRA. DSC is one of the most commonly used methods to study the cement hydration mechanism [19] . According to the principle of cement chemistry, the hydration products like C-S-H gel, ettringite and calcium hydroxide can be qualitatively analyzed by DSC curves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydration mechanism of cement paste with SRA. DSC is one of the most commonly used methods to study the cement hydration mechanism [19] . According to the principle of cement chemistry, the hydration products like C-S-H gel, ettringite and calcium hydroxide can be qualitatively analyzed by DSC curves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, taking the optimized flushing fluid concentration as the reference, the compound experiment of the two flushing fluids is carried out to evaluate the wetting reversal ability and the wetting reversal effect of the isolation fluid in the oil-based drilling fluid. The contact angle method, Amott method, and USBM method are three commonly used methods for quantitative measurement of wettability. The contact angle method is the most intuitive and simple method to measure the wettability of crude oil and brine on polished minerals, and it is also the best method when it is used for pure fluids and artificial cores. The Amott method and USBM method can measure the average wettability of the core, which is better than the contact angle method when measuring the wettability of an original or complex core; the USBM method is more sensitive than the Amott method when it is close to neutral wettability, but for the system of partial wettability and mixed wettability, the USBM method is unable to measure and the Amott method is more sensitive .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%