2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2004.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of MRI abnormality in skull base bone on prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of skull base invasion were considered positive in cases in which the skull base had signals similar to those of the adjacent tumor on all pre-and postcontrast T1-weighted images in the cortical bone and bone marrow space on the MR image (low signal intensity on a T1-weighted image and contrast enhancement on the postcontrast T1-weighted image with fat suppression). 8,9,[17][18][19][20][21] We performed evaluations mainly on the basis of the precontrast 3D T1-weighted Dixon in-phase image and the postcontrast 3D T1-weighted Dixon water image. Other sequences were also used for identifying tumor location.…”
Section: Mr Imaging and Ct Diagnostic Criteria For Skull Base Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings of skull base invasion were considered positive in cases in which the skull base had signals similar to those of the adjacent tumor on all pre-and postcontrast T1-weighted images in the cortical bone and bone marrow space on the MR image (low signal intensity on a T1-weighted image and contrast enhancement on the postcontrast T1-weighted image with fat suppression). 8,9,[17][18][19][20][21] We performed evaluations mainly on the basis of the precontrast 3D T1-weighted Dixon in-phase image and the postcontrast 3D T1-weighted Dixon water image. Other sequences were also used for identifying tumor location.…”
Section: Mr Imaging and Ct Diagnostic Criteria For Skull Base Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent research has indicated that some of the skull-base invasions on MRI had significantly better prognosis than the others. 12,13 Hence, further research on their prognostic value has been carried out with a large sample of MRI-detected skull-base abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to grade skull-base invasion on MRI and judge its prognosis precisely.…”
Section: Skull-base Invasion Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Skull-base invasion on MRI was established by the presence of low-intensity tissue in highsignal bone marrow on the T 1 -weighted image and Gd-DTPA enhancement of the abnormal tissue 8,13 MRI findings of skull-base invasion were assessed at the following sites: pterygoid process, base of sphenoid bone, petrous apex, clivus, foramen lacerum, pterygoid canal, great wing of sphenoid bone, pterygopalantine fossa, foramen rotundum, foramen ovale, jugular foramen, hypoglossal canal, internal acoustic meatus, and facial canal.…”
Section: Participants Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skull base invasion is seen in up to 60% of NPC patients at diagnosis (King et al, 1999;Roh et al, 2004), with the most common sites of involvement being the clivus, pterygoid bones, body of the sphenoid bone, and apices of the petrous temporal bones (King & Bhatia, 2010). In addition, the number of sites involved within the skull base may have prognostic significance (Lu et al, 2004). Assessment of the skull base should focus on five key regions: clivus, right pterygoid base, left pterygoid base, right petrous apex, and left petrous apex (King & Bhatia, 2010).…”
Section: T3 Npcmentioning
confidence: 99%