Influence of Motion Therapy in the Prevention of Lumbar Pain Syndrome Relapse

Abstract

Introduction:Lumbar pain syndrome is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice, more common than 290 other pathological conditions, which affect up to 84% of adults in a certain period of their life. The origin of the lower back pain can be classified as mechanical, neuropathic and secondary due to another illness. Patient education and information, muscle strengthening exercises, maintenance of routine daily physical activity and pain therapy are the basis of acute non-specific pain syndrome therapy.Aim:To determine the success of the motion therapy procedure in the prevention of lumbar pain syndrome relapse.Material and methods:The research is prospective, longitudinal, manipulative and controllable. It was conducted in the private practice “Praxis - dr. Pecar” in the period from June 20, 2014 to June 1, 2016, and included 200 respondents with symptoms of lumbar pain syndromes divided into the experimental (n=100) and control (n=100) groups. The presence of lumbar pain syndrome relapse in respondents experimental and control group was recorded in the second and third clinical examination.Results:In the second examination, 4 (4%) of the respondents from experimental group and 37 (37%) of the control group responded had LBS relapse. In the third examination, the number of respondents with recurrent LBS in the experimental group was 4 (4%), while in the control group was 17 (17%). After the study, no statistically significant difference was observed in the mean age of respondents who had LBS relapse compared to respondents without LBS relapse, as well as significant influence of sex structure on relapse in the experimental and control group during the second and third examination.Conclusion:After the second examination, the relapse rate in the experimental group was statistically significantly higher in the respondents withstanding jobs, while there was no statistically significant difference in the control group and both groups after the third examination.

Understanding social determinants of health and physical therapy outcomes in patients with low back pain: A scoping review

“…Most studies evaluated the effect of sex on function ( n = 39), pain ( n = 26), and psychological well‐being ( n = 13; Table 3). No effect of sex was found in 35 studies (Adnan et al., 2017; Alodaibi et al., 2021; Anderson et al., 2011; Beissner et al., 2012; Beneciuk et al., 2013; Berglund et al., 2015; Brennan et al., 2021; Brooks C, Kennedy S, & Marshall PW, 2012; Burns et al., 2018; Cougot et al., 2015; Feitosa et al., 2016; Fisher et al., 2020; Fritz et al., 2019; Fritz et al., 2013; George & Stryker, 2011; Glattacker et al., 2018; Hügli et al., 2015; Jensen et al., 2013; Kaljic et al., 2018; Murphy et al., 2014; Nava‐Bringas et al., 2016; Neyaz et al., 2019; O’Leary et al., 2020; Oliveira et al., 2019; Pak, Miller, & Cheuy, 2021a; Pietsch et al., 2021; Preuper et al., 2011; Rasmussen‐Barr et al., 2012; Schaller et al., 2017; Stapelfeldt et al., 2011; Van Hooff et al., 2014; Van Koppen et al., 2016; Varela & Van Asselt, 2022; Werneke, Hart, George, Deutscher, & Stratford, 2011; Zheng et al., 2018) while 14 studies demonstrated male sex was associated with better outcomes (Bath & Lovo Grona, 2015; de Heer & Warren, 2016; Farin, 2015; Fehrmann et al., 2022; George & Stryker, 2011; Glattacker et al., 2012; Hadizadeh et al., 2020; Lonsdale et al., 2017; Lutz et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2017; Ozcan Kahraman et al., 2018; Park & Lee, 2016; Wilson et al., 2011; Yağcı et al., 2020). Female sex and better outcomes were demonstrated in seven studies (Beneciuk & George, 2021; Görge...…”

“…The majority of studies evaluated the effect of age on function ( n = 35), pain ( n = 23), and psychological well‐being ( n = 11; Table 3). No effect of age was found in 31 studies (Abu et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2011; Beissner et al., 2012; Beneciuk et al., 2013; Beneciuk & George, 2021; Berglund et al., 2015; Brennan et al., 2021; Burns et al., 2018; Cougot et al., 2015; Feitosa et al., 2016; Fritz et al., 2019, 2011; George & Stryker, 2011; Glattacker et al., 2012, 2018, Görge et al., 2017; Hügli et al., 2015; Kaljic et al., 2018; Murphy et al., 2014; Nava‐Bringas et al., 2016; Neyaz et al., 2019; O’Leary et al., 2020; Oliveira et al., 2019; Pak et al., 2021; Rajamani et al., 2020; Rasmussen‐Barr et al., 2012; Schaller et al., 2017; Stapelfeldt et al., 2011; Van Hooff et al., 2014; Van Koppen et al., 2016; Walston & McLester, 2020), while 16 studies demonstrated that younger age was associated with better outcomes (Adnan et al., 2017; Alodaibi et al., 2021; Bath & Lovo Grona, 2015; de Heer & Warren, 2016; Fritz et al., 2013; Gregg et al., 2014; Harsted et al., 2021; Heidari et al., 2017; Jensen et al., 2013; Lutz et al., 2020; Preuper et al., 2011; Schwind et al., 2013; Verkerk et al., 2015; Werneke, Hart, George, et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2011; Yağcı et al., 2020). Older age and better outcomes were demonstrated in four studies (Dhondt et al., 2020; Farin, 2015; Fehrmann et al., 2022; George & Stryker, 2011), one study demonstrate...…”

“…Most studies evaluated the effect of sex on function (n = 39), pain (n = 26), and psychological well-being (n = 13; Table 3). No effect of sex was found in 35 studies (Adnan et al, 2017;Alodaibi et al, 2021;Anderson et al, 2011;Beissner et al, 2012;Beneciuk et al, 2013;Berglund et al, 2015;Brennan et al, 2021;Brooks C, Kennedy S, & Marshall PW, 2012;Burns et al, 2018;Cougot et al, 2015;Feitosa et al, 2016;Fisher et al, 2020;Fritz et al, 2019;Fritz et al, 2013;George & Stryker, 2011;Glattacker et al, 2018;Hügli et al, 2015;Jensen et al, 2013;Kaljic et al, 2018;Murphy et al, 2014;Nava-Bringas et al, 2016;Neyaz et al, 2019;O'Leary et al, 2020;Oliveira et al, 2019;Pak, Miller, & Cheuy, 2021a;Pietsch et al, 2021;Preuper et al, 2011;Rasmussen-Barr et al, 2012;Schaller et al, 2017;Stapelfeldt et al, 2011;Van Hooff et al, 2014;Van Koppen et al, 2016;Varela & Van Asselt, 2022;Werneke, Hart, George, Deutscher, & Stratford, 2011;Zheng et al, 2018) while 14 T A B L E 1 Inclusion/exclusion criteria.…”

Influence of motion therapy on daily life activities of people with lumbar pain syndrome

“…The percentage of adults who suffer from low back pain at some point in their lives is 84%. According to data from the literature, the annual incidence of a first episode of low back pain ranges from 6.3% to 15.6%, the annual incidence of each episode of low back pain ranges from 1.5% to 36%, and recurrence is estimated to range from 24% to 80% on an annual basis (4,5,11,12).…”

“…For subacute pain (6-12 weeks), return to daily activities takes up to 3 months. Chronic low back pain (longer than 12 weeks) occurs in 8% of sufferers, and in this case the likelihood of full recovery decreases (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Pain distribution, dermatomes, reflexes, and myotomes differentiate the clinical picture into local, referential, or radicular pain (radiculitis or radiculopathy), and the distinction between nonspecific/specific and acute/subacute/ chronic pain is useful not only for epidemiological studies but also for choosing appropriate strategies for its diagnosis and treatment (8,(16)(17)(18).…”