2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, mathematical modeling predicts that plaques with the embedded calcified spots display higher wall stress concentration in the fibrous cap a bit upstream to the calcified spot, even in the presence of mild stenosis (38). We emphasize that when patients with a degree of stenosis #30% are considered, the presence of echogenic plaques is still significantly associated with future MACE, even after adjusting for mean IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, mathematical modeling predicts that plaques with the embedded calcified spots display higher wall stress concentration in the fibrous cap a bit upstream to the calcified spot, even in the presence of mild stenosis (38). We emphasize that when patients with a degree of stenosis #30% are considered, the presence of echogenic plaques is still significantly associated with future MACE, even after adjusting for mean IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Obesity 223 (38) 127 (37) 96 ( (18) 45 (13) 61 (26) ,0.0001 14 ( (14) 35 (10) 44 ( (Fig. 1A) plaques.…”
Section: Follow-up and Incident Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-Ca contributed to increase in stresses within the aortic wall (comparison of FSI simulations with and without Ca), while larger plaque-like Ca appeared to locally reduce these stresses. 4 At the interface between the rigid embedded Ca and the much softer wall material there was a strong stress gradient that propagated around the calcification. This stress gradient may offer a significant contribution to the rupture potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data showed that wall motion of non-stenosed coronary arteries was approximately less than 8.4% of the vessel diameter (5.4±2% [19] and 2% [20] in terms of strain, 8.4% in diameter [21]). However, studies on stenosis and plaque structure [22][23][24][25] have demonstrated the importance of FSI in stenosed arteries. FSI analyses of coronary arteries are still sparse, largely due to lack of in vivo information such as subject-specific material properties, flow and pressure waveforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%