2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of microarc oxidation and hard anodizing on plain fatigue and fretting fatigue behaviour of Al–Mg–Si alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the difference of fatigue life between PEO coating and PEO with impregnation epoxy resin was to be caused by the difference of fatigue crack initiation life. Moreover, the difference of fatigue life and influence factors (except the surface hardness without discussion) between hard anodized coating and PEO coating on the aluminum alloys had been described in previous literature by Yerokhin et al (1999Yerokhin et al ( , 2004Yerokhin et al ( , 2005, Lonyuk et al (2007), Nykyforchyn et al (1998), Sheasby and Pinner (2001), Rateick et al (1996), Asquith et al (2006), Khan et al (2005), Dieter and Bacon (1988), Monsalv et al (2007), and Rajasekaran, Raman, Krishna, Joshi, and Sundararajan (2008). The synergistic effects of oxide coating and aluminum substrates attracted a wide variety of study by means of choosing different processing parameters in the anodized coating process.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface Modification On the Fatigue Strength Of Amentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the difference of fatigue life between PEO coating and PEO with impregnation epoxy resin was to be caused by the difference of fatigue crack initiation life. Moreover, the difference of fatigue life and influence factors (except the surface hardness without discussion) between hard anodized coating and PEO coating on the aluminum alloys had been described in previous literature by Yerokhin et al (1999Yerokhin et al ( , 2004Yerokhin et al ( , 2005, Lonyuk et al (2007), Nykyforchyn et al (1998), Sheasby and Pinner (2001), Rateick et al (1996), Asquith et al (2006), Khan et al (2005), Dieter and Bacon (1988), Monsalv et al (2007), and Rajasekaran, Raman, Krishna, Joshi, and Sundararajan (2008). The synergistic effects of oxide coating and aluminum substrates attracted a wide variety of study by means of choosing different processing parameters in the anodized coating process.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface Modification On the Fatigue Strength Of Amentioning
confidence: 85%
“…3 However, the applications of aluminum alloys are seriously restricted by their low surface hardness and high wear rate. [4][5][6][7] To date, many aluminum alloy surface treatment methods have been developed and employed to improve the hardness and friction performance of aluminum alloy. However, most of these technologies require high temperature and are complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, anodizing coatings and plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings have become effective methods for improving the corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys (Nykyforchyn et al, 1998;Yerokhin et al, 1999;2004;Khan et al, 2005;Guo et al, 2007;Rajasekaran et al, 2008). Unfortunately, some results have indicated that anodized or PEO coatingsubstrate structures have reduced fatigue strength or fatigue life compared with uncoated substrates (Eifert et al, 1999;Yerokhin et al, 2004;Rajasekaran et al, 2008). Wang et al (2014; provided a method for improving the fatigue strength of coated-substrate of Al 2024-T4 alloy by using PEO with an impregnation epoxy resin sealing pore method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%