1982
DOI: 10.21236/ada111549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Meteorological Processes on the Verticality of Electric Fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely related to the aircraft's fuselage charging up more within the ABL than above it, which leads to an increased influence of the aircraft's motion on the charge sensors. A similar effect was reported by Hill (1982), who demonstrated that the gradient of the relationship between the bank angle of their UAS and E-field was steeper at 2000 ft than 6000 ft. Thus, flying above the ABL, rather than below it, is also advantageous to minimize the effects of aircraft movement on charge measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely related to the aircraft's fuselage charging up more within the ABL than above it, which leads to an increased influence of the aircraft's motion on the charge sensors. A similar effect was reported by Hill (1982), who demonstrated that the gradient of the relationship between the bank angle of their UAS and E-field was steeper at 2000 ft than 6000 ft. Thus, flying above the ABL, rather than below it, is also advantageous to minimize the effects of aircraft movement on charge measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Technological developments are leading to more meteorological measurements from UAS (e.g., Pinto et al 2021). Examples of UAS measurements in atmospheric electricity include the development of an "electrostatic autopilot" (Hill 1972(Hill , 1982, as well as the miniature E-field sensor measurements of Bateman et al (2007) In this work, we describe two types of measurement, made from a small fixed-wing UAS, model MASC-3. Its small size means that it is not feasible to carry a large number of E-field sensors as per the common approach used on larger aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%