2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mesh size and tooth spacing on the proportion of damaged organisms in the catches of the Portuguese clam dredge fishery

Abstract: Experiments to assess the effect of mesh size and tooth spacing on the catch of Spisula solida were undertaken with the aim of determining an optimal combination of these two characteristics to minimize the dredging impact on by-catch species. However, our data showed that tooth spacing, mesh size and the interactions between these two factors did not affect the number of damaged macrofaunal individual's caught. This may be because infauna entered the dredge without passing through the space between the teeth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The alteration of sediment features may influence the colonization and presence of benthic species, including target ones, leading to long-term changes in community structure (Pranovi & Giovanardi, 1994;Pranovi et al, 1998). In this way, there has been increasing recent interest in evaluating the collateral effects of commercial cultivation of bivalves on the marine environment (Sorokin et al, 1999;Bartoli et al, 2001;Jie et al, 2001;Dame et al, 2002), especially on macrobenthic communities (Kaiser et al, 1996;Drake & Arias, 1997;Spencer et al, 1997;Gaspar et al, 2002;. The main effect on non-target species is a reduction in species richness and abundance (Commito, 1987;Dittman, 1990;Guenther, 1996;Ragnarsson & Raffaelli, 1999;Beadman et al, 2004;Pranovi et al, 2004), although in some cases the opposite effect has been recorded (Mantovani et al, 2006).…”
Section: Impact Of T Philippinarum Cultivation On Marine Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alteration of sediment features may influence the colonization and presence of benthic species, including target ones, leading to long-term changes in community structure (Pranovi & Giovanardi, 1994;Pranovi et al, 1998). In this way, there has been increasing recent interest in evaluating the collateral effects of commercial cultivation of bivalves on the marine environment (Sorokin et al, 1999;Bartoli et al, 2001;Jie et al, 2001;Dame et al, 2002), especially on macrobenthic communities (Kaiser et al, 1996;Drake & Arias, 1997;Spencer et al, 1997;Gaspar et al, 2002;. The main effect on non-target species is a reduction in species richness and abundance (Commito, 1987;Dittman, 1990;Guenther, 1996;Ragnarsson & Raffaelli, 1999;Beadman et al, 2004;Pranovi et al, 2004), although in some cases the opposite effect has been recorded (Mantovani et al, 2006).…”
Section: Impact Of T Philippinarum Cultivation On Marine Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spisula solida is heavily fished in the south coast of Portugal Gaspar et al, 2002;Chícharo et al, 2002a,b). The present study raises questions of proper fisheries management.…”
Section: Spisula Solidamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marine soft sediments, physical disturbance seems to be a key factor controlling the spatial and temporal compositions of the populations inhabiting those areas (Dernie et al, 2003). This disturbance may be naturally induced, such as waves and tide impacts (Snelgrove et al, 1998;Hewitt et al, 2003), but may also be due to anthropogenic perturbations, such as fishing (Chícharo et al, 2002a,b;Gaspar et al, 2002;Dernie et al, 2003) and dredging activities (Sardá et al, 2000). At a smaller scale, complex biological interactions, which in turn control sediment properties, also play an important role in regulating patterns of the biota (Snelgrove et al, 1998;Reise, 2002;Hewitt et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations