2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of membrane character on suppression of coffee-ring effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore size distribution of the pristine PES and PES[6 +][0] was determined using an open-source image analysis tool (ImageJ, https://imagej.nih.gov ). The details of the image analysis procedure are similar to that of Shahruddin et al [ 29 ]. The pore size distribution represents the population analysis of various pore diameters present on the membranes’ surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore size distribution of the pristine PES and PES[6 +][0] was determined using an open-source image analysis tool (ImageJ, https://imagej.nih.gov ). The details of the image analysis procedure are similar to that of Shahruddin et al [ 29 ]. The pore size distribution represents the population analysis of various pore diameters present on the membranes’ surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the BMOF‐printed filter paper showed a 2‐fold higher cell capture capacity than BMOF‐printed PVDF (Figure 2c), which could be attributed to the “coffee ring” effect caused by the PVDF membrane. [ 36 ] Compared to the previous research, directly grafting PBA or other small molecules on the substrates usually requires extra steps of covalent modification, [ 10a,11,35 ] otherwise, these small molecules can be easily passed out through the substrate (i.e., filter paper) or buried underneath the substrate, thus leading to low PBA density on the surface. In our research, inkjet‐printing the BMOF nanoparticles on paper‐based substrate endows the IVDs with large surface roughness (as shown in the AFM image in Figure 1h and Figures S10 and S11: Supporting Information), which helps boronic functional groups to better present on the surface, thus increasing the interaction with cell targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sorbent surface commonly used for protein immobilization in immunodetection is a polymeric membrane (Surti et al, 2022). Nitrocellulose (Shahruddin et al, 2021), nylon (El-Moghazy et al, 2020), and poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) (Ahmad et al, 2016a) are the most common types of polymeric membrane for immobilization of the protein constituent, due to desirable characteristics such as stable and controllable surface properties, a large surface area, high binding affinity and stability of the biomolecules toward the substrate, simple handling and cheap large-scale production. Each of them has its strengths and weaknesses, in which the final selection of the membrane usually depends on the application of interest.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%