1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80175-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mean sound pressure level on jitter and shimmer measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also be related to the fact that SPL was lower in the MC group. Higher F0 and SPL -that is higher activity in the laryngeal muscles -tends to decrease the amount of perturbation [43,44 , see also ref. 45 about the sensitivity of perturbation measures to F0 and intensity].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It may also be related to the fact that SPL was lower in the MC group. Higher F0 and SPL -that is higher activity in the laryngeal muscles -tends to decrease the amount of perturbation [43,44 , see also ref. 45 about the sensitivity of perturbation measures to F0 and intensity].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Progressive thickening of the laryngeal epithelium with age has been reported which may contribute to the increased jitter and shimmer values observed in older voices. It is noted that for an individual, vocal perturbations are highly affected by the intensity of vowel production, with decreasing jitter and shimmer with increased intensity [54,55,56]. Jitter and shimmer also seem to decrease with an increase in F0 [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although changes were observed in the instrumented measures, careful inspection of them indicated that the effects could imply either warm-up or fatigue effects. In other words, the increase in F 0 , SPL, and alpha ratio are normal adaptations to vocal loading and may lead to decreased perturbations as observed (Laukkanen et al, 2006;Orlikoff & Baken, 1990;Orlikoff & Kahane, 1991). Moreover, in the study by Laukkanen et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%