2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of material factors on the determination of dynamic moduli and associated prediction models for different types of asphalt mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate the effects of gradation, PU type, PU binder, and aggregate type on the dynamic modulus and phase angle. In the statistical analysis [25,26], gradation, PU type, PU binder, and aggregate type were considered independent variables, whereas temperature and loading frequency were covariates. The dynamic modulus and phase angle were regarded as dependent variables or responses.…”
Section: Statistic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate the effects of gradation, PU type, PU binder, and aggregate type on the dynamic modulus and phase angle. In the statistical analysis [25,26], gradation, PU type, PU binder, and aggregate type were considered independent variables, whereas temperature and loading frequency were covariates. The dynamic modulus and phase angle were regarded as dependent variables or responses.…”
Section: Statistic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of size can be characterized in terms of shape and mass; Di Benedetto et al experimentally demonstrated that specimen size and mass affect the magnitude of the dynamic modulus [15]. In addition, there are many dynamic modulus testing methods with different loading modes and different specimen shapes, including uniaxial compression, indirect tension, four-point bending, etc., [16][17][18]. Huang et al conducted dynamic modulus tests for trapezoid beams and cylinders and found that the dynamic modulus was smaller in trapezoid beam tests [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%