1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199705/06)10:3<148::aid-jmr360>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mass transfer and surface ligand heterogeneity on quantitative BIAcoreTM binding data. Analysis of the interaction of NC10 Fab with an anti-idiotype Fab′

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1D, inset). Thus, the K d values obtained using the kinetic or the affinity measurements were similar, indicating that the potential mass transport complications and the analyte (dEGR–FIXa) rebinding during the dissociation phase are minimal under our experimental conditions [12]. Moreover, the binding of dEGR–FIXa was ∼ 3.7‐fold weaker in 1.1 m m Ca 2+ than in 5 m m Ca 2+ or 1.1 m m Ca 2+ /0.6 mm Mg 2+ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…1D, inset). Thus, the K d values obtained using the kinetic or the affinity measurements were similar, indicating that the potential mass transport complications and the analyte (dEGR–FIXa) rebinding during the dissociation phase are minimal under our experimental conditions [12]. Moreover, the binding of dEGR–FIXa was ∼ 3.7‐fold weaker in 1.1 m m Ca 2+ than in 5 m m Ca 2+ or 1.1 m m Ca 2+ /0.6 mm Mg 2+ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Data were corrected for instrument and bulk artifacts by double referencing (15) a surface-immobilized with capture antibody without scFvFc-scFv using Scrubber version 2.0c software (BioLogic Software). The transformed data were fit to a 1:1 binding model in Biacore T200 evaluation software v1.0 (GE Healthcare), which includes a parameter for mass transfer (16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Affinity measurement is thus a critical step in the evaluation of mAbs for diagnostic or prophylactic applications, and may also be key to select mAbs for use in the identification of microbial antigens suitable for vaccine development. Considering the caveats of currently available technologies to quantify affinity [8] , [12] , [14] , [15] , [20] , there is a need for a rapid high-throughput method using low quantities of antibody, to allow efficient characterization of large numbers of mAbs. We developed a computational approach based on data generated by a microfluidic system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, these assays rely on endpoint analysis, as is the case for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) titration [7] . Drawbacks of the first category are the complicated measurement of the long dissociation times imposed by very high-affinity (K D ≤ 10 −12 M) binding, and the potential of artifacts due to mass-transport effects and steric hindrance of reagents [8] . ELISA-based methods can handle wider K D ranges (10 −13 to 10 −07 M [9] ), but are based on in-solution measurements performed after the equilibrium between antigen-bound and free antibodies has been reached [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%