2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2342-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(127 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…distraction, as shown in the present study. Thus, in accordance with our first hypothesis, a greater distraction substantially alters segmental kinematics and does not per se increase the overall stability of the segment in flexion-extension as well as in axial rotation and lateral bending, as previously supposed Siepe et al, 2012). In addition to these substantial alterations in segmental kinematics, a sole iatrogenic distraction can result in high FCLFs during surgery and thus might harm these ligaments during the surgical intervention.…”
Section: Cc-position (Mm)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…distraction, as shown in the present study. Thus, in accordance with our first hypothesis, a greater distraction substantially alters segmental kinematics and does not per se increase the overall stability of the segment in flexion-extension as well as in axial rotation and lateral bending, as previously supposed Siepe et al, 2012). In addition to these substantial alterations in segmental kinematics, a sole iatrogenic distraction can result in high FCLFs during surgery and thus might harm these ligaments during the surgical intervention.…”
Section: Cc-position (Mm)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The influence of the preoperative disc height on the outcome after of TDR is an on-going subject of debate; some authors argue that a preoperative more rigid and collapsed disc might compensate for the rotational instability of an artificial disc (e.g., Siepe et al, 2012). In the present study, FE models type 1 and 4 with higher preoperative disc heights and thus lower disc stiffnesses, predicted a larger average RoM, especially during flexion (Maquer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Range Of Lateral Bending (Deg)mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Considerable progress with regard to the assessment of adequate indications and contraindications for TDR has been made [33][34][35][36][37][63][64][65][66], outcome-determining factors have been identified including the adequate extent of DDD, knowledge on the center of rotation, segmental and sagittal alignment after TDR, influence of pre-and postoperative mobility, and adequate implant placement [15,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. Similarly, biomechanical and radiological studies have investigated the effect of TDR on the index and adjacent level as well as motion characteristics of the prosthesis and the lumbar spine to a large extent .…”
Section: Learning Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical surgical methods include simple discectomy and/or spinal fusion with or without spinal instrumentation. Recent innovative motion‐sparing surgical techniques include artificial disc replacement technologies, posterior dynamic stabilization, and disc nucleus replacement (DNR) . The principles underlying these procedures are related to either ablation of IVD structures considered as “pain generators” or to stabilization of abnormal motion patterns …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%