2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp202279b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Lone-Pair Cations on the Germanate Anomaly in Glass

Abstract: Neutron diffraction has been used to study the structure of a series of thallium germanate glasses, Tl2O–GeO2, containing up to 40 mol % Tl2O, as a means of investigating the influence of lone-pair cations on the germanate anomaly. As observed previously in alkali germanate glasses, the average Ge–O coordination number, n GeO, is found to rise above four as Tl2O is added to the glass. However, whereas for alkali germanates n GeO has its maximum value (∼4.36 ± 0.03) at ∼19 mol % R2O (e.g., R = Cs), for thallium… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(80 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the combination of MC-EPSR and minimal constraints we have produced a set of interatomic potentials that are consistent with experimental techniques and are transferable to new glass compositions. In agreement with previous glass structure studies [27][28] we find that including a lone-pair is required to constrain the model to the expected interatomic arrangement and coordination numbers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Through the combination of MC-EPSR and minimal constraints we have produced a set of interatomic potentials that are consistent with experimental techniques and are transferable to new glass compositions. In agreement with previous glass structure studies [27][28] we find that including a lone-pair is required to constrain the model to the expected interatomic arrangement and coordination numbers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…High lead oxide glasses from PbO-M 2 O 3 systems such as the lead borates, 79 83 includes claims of a composition of 90 mol% PbO, however, the laboratory x-ray diffraction data are of insufficient quality to rule out Al 2 O 3 contents (arising from crucible contamination) larger than those stated, and the absence of a Pb-O peak in the radial distribution function was not explained. Takaishi et al 14 claimed to have studied an 89 mol% PbO lead silicate glass, however, their radial distribution function is consistent with a much lower Pb concentration, estimated at 72 mol% PbO from their reported glass density of 7.50 g/cm 3 . Combined with the fact that the authors 14 do not take into account apodization effects, their quoted coordination numbers are subject to large uncertainties.…”
Section: High Lead Oxide Glass Studiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the role of the stereochemically active electron lone-pairs on the Pb 2+ ions, particularly in relation to the free volume, was not considered. A different structural model for lead silicate glasses has been proposed by Takaishi et al, 14 in which the Pb cations are present predominantly as PbO 3 trigonal pyramids, which are interconnected by edges to form Pb 2 O 4 moieties, and have opposed orientations arising from steric repulsion between their respective electron lone-pairs. Whether or not a three-dimensional space-filling model, with the correct atomic number density, can be constructed based on such motifs was not addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also interesting from the structural point of view. The presence of minima or maxima in physicochemical properties of germanate-based glasses under addition of various network-modifiers usually well correlate with the coordination change GeO 4 tetrahedra ⟷ GeO 6 octahedra, the formation of Ge-O-Ge bridging bonds and/or the creation of nonbridging oxygen atoms NBO’s [ 12 , 13 ]. The structural mechanism responsible for the germanate anomaly well-known in the literature was proposed for glasses based on PbO-GeO 2 [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%