2012
DOI: 10.17221/112/2011-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of limestone and amphibolite application on growth of Norway spruce plantation under harsh mountain conditions

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The results of a fifteen-year period of investigations conducted on Norway spruce in the upper plateau of the Jizerské hory Mts. were summarised. The objectives were to evaluate the growth performance of an experimental plantation under harsh environmental conditions and assess the effects of amendments as well as the influence of the forest site variability on growth performance and survival of young spruces. The following treatments were distinguished: (1) lower control, (2) limestone and (3) amphib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding corresponds to the results by Koňasová et al (2012): in the above mentioned work they state the positive limestone effect on the top shoot length; the similar response was also observed with amphibolite application. However, Vavříček et al (2011) present a different conclusion; the calcareous effect on the top shoots length was not noticeable.…”
Section: Fertilizers Effect On the Top Shoots Lengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding corresponds to the results by Koňasová et al (2012): in the above mentioned work they state the positive limestone effect on the top shoot length; the similar response was also observed with amphibolite application. However, Vavříček et al (2011) present a different conclusion; the calcareous effect on the top shoots length was not noticeable.…”
Section: Fertilizers Effect On the Top Shoots Lengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(Vavříček et al, 2011). The decline in Norway spruce nutrition was also found by Koňasová et al (2012) during their fertilization experiment. However, in that case, there was nitrogen concentration decline caused by applying ground limestone and amphibolites: other nutrients were not affected.…”
Section: Discussion the Effect Of Fertilizers On The Concentration Ofmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The effect on foliage nutrient content was negligible. The control option had more nitrogen concentration, probably due to the support of microbial activity in the soil, leading to higher consumption of nitrogen (Koňasová et al 2012).…”
Section: Use Of Fertilizers On Afforestations Of the Clear-cuts Caused By Air-pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are instances where site nutrient limitations are an issue and field site fertilization has benefited seedling establishment (e.g. Grossnickle 2000;Koňasová 2012;Ruthrof et al 2016). Due to the variability of success in past field fertilization programs to consistently enhance performance on restoration sites, this silvicultural practice is considered an expensive and an inefficient approach to supplying nutrients to seedlings under all but sites with defined nutrient limitations (Brockley 1988).…”
Section: Seedling Responsementioning
confidence: 99%