2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of lightly salting and sugaring on the quality and water distribution of grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idellus ) during super-chilled storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous researches have also confirmed that LF-NMR measurements were associated with quality parameters, such as WHC, drip loss, color, and so on [16,27,28]. In the current study, the relationship between LF-NMR relaxation parameters and quality indexes was investigated during refrigerated storage (Table 2).…”
Section: Linear Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Previous researches have also confirmed that LF-NMR measurements were associated with quality parameters, such as WHC, drip loss, color, and so on [16,27,28]. In the current study, the relationship between LF-NMR relaxation parameters and quality indexes was investigated during refrigerated storage (Table 2).…”
Section: Linear Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Lyhs et al. (2001) observed a shelf life of 18 and 20 days for Rainbow trout gravads stored at 8 and 3°C, respectively, while a shelf life of 45 days was determined for grass carp fillet slices preserved with 1.6% salt and 0.8% sugar mix during storage at −3 ± 1°C (Qin et al., 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, T 21 showed that the bound water varied ranging from 0.79% to 1.01% during superchilling storage (Figure 3a). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) among the gelatin active coating containing eugenol and the MAP treated sea bass samples during superchilling storage at −0.9 • C, indicting T 21 could not be affected by the treated ways as well as storage time, which was due to the water entrapped within highly organized myofibril structures [70,71]. T 22 was considered as immobile water within the myofibril [72] and pT 22 diminished progressively during superchilling storage.…”
Section: Water Distribution By Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (mentioning
confidence: 95%