2012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of light source and extended time of curing on microhardness and degree of conversion of different regions of a nanofilled composite resin

Abstract: Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different light sources and curing time on the degree of conversion and microhardness of two surfaces within a nanofilled composite resin.Methods:Four experimental groups (n=10) were formed in accordance with the light source (quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH – 600mW/cm2), or light-emitting-diode (LED - 800mW/cm2)) and the time of curing (20 s or 40 s). The specimens were prepared with a circular mould (5 mm ∅ and 2 mm thick), according to the respect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lack of interference with light transmission, it is reasonable that the T surfaces of the composite discs registered significantly higher VMH values than did the respective B surfaces in most of the experimental subgroups, as occurred in previous research (Table ). Since light passes through the mass of the matrix and the composite, its intensity is greatly decreased due to the light absorption and spreading by the restorative material, reducing its potential to cure .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the lack of interference with light transmission, it is reasonable that the T surfaces of the composite discs registered significantly higher VMH values than did the respective B surfaces in most of the experimental subgroups, as occurred in previous research (Table ). Since light passes through the mass of the matrix and the composite, its intensity is greatly decreased due to the light absorption and spreading by the restorative material, reducing its potential to cure .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recently marketed LEDs are still compared with conventional QTHs, as the latter are considered the gold standard for LCUs. Whereas some studies attribute better top and bottom VMH values to resin composites polymerized with LEDs, other studies, including our experiment, confirm that the type of LCU does not affect the composite VMH . The QTH resulted in a higher B VMH than the LED only when polymerizing 2‐mm high composite samples in the absence of a matrix (Table ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LED units also generate minimal heat and do not require cooling fans, so they are smaller and lighter in weight than other technologies. Nevertheless, LED technology has two main drawbacks: First, because first‐ and second‐generation LEDs emit light matching the absorption spectrum of camphorquinone (430–500 nm), they may not provide adequate curing of composite resins containing alternative initiators. Second, the manufacturers of LED units recommend irradiation times of 20 s and 40 s, whereas shorter curing times are always preferable in clinical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously demonstrated, radiant exposure, irradiance, wavelength, and distance of the light-curing tip can influence the degree of conversion (DC) of resin materials 11141516…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%