2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of light intensity on the photodegradation of bisphenol A polycarbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UV absorption spectra were recorded for the accelerated and outdoor degraded BPA-PC films. The UV absorption spectra for the accelerated experiments show increased absorption with irradiation times [14]. The outdoor weathered samples show similar behavior; with increasing irradiation time, the absorption below 400 nm is increasing.…”
Section: Comparison Of Accelerated and Outdoor Exposure Testsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UV absorption spectra were recorded for the accelerated and outdoor degraded BPA-PC films. The UV absorption spectra for the accelerated experiments show increased absorption with irradiation times [14]. The outdoor weathered samples show similar behavior; with increasing irradiation time, the absorption below 400 nm is increasing.…”
Section: Comparison Of Accelerated and Outdoor Exposure Testsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In our previous work, a linear relation was found between the scaling factors, derived from UV and IR absorption, and changes in irradiation intensity [14]. Therefore it was expected that at the same dosage in the accelerated and in the outdoor weathering test a comparable amount of degradation would be found.…”
Section: Comparison Of Accelerated and Outdoor Exposure Testsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Comparatively, CZ was degraded slower under UV-254 than UV-225-425, but the removal rate of CZ was also up to 98.41% at 60 min, and it followed the pseudo-first-order kinetic equation well (R 2 = 0.9985, p < 0.0001) [30]. The large difference in degradation rate of CZ under UV-225-425 and UV-254 was mainly caused by the power imparity of light source [31,32]. A nearest literature reported that the half-life (t 1/2 ) of CZ under UV-254 was 3.95 min [23], slightly lower than present study (9.78 min), which might cause by the different photodegradation conditions, such as light source (), photo-reactor, initial concentration etc.…”
Section: Uv Photodegradation Compared To Chlorinationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, an early report pointed out that the photodegradation of CZ (15.8 mg/L) under UV-A and UV-B appeared to be pH-dependent (pH = 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0) with the k values range of 0.0099-0.0165 min −1 [22]. Similarily, this contrast may also explain by the difference of photodegradation conditions [19,31,33].…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Photodegradation Of Czmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation