2010
DOI: 10.3354/ab00241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of light intensity and nutrient source on δ13C and δ15N signatures in Ulva pertusa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that the “AI” is likely to overestimate the contribution of autotrophs to epilithon in shaded ponds, given that algae in lower light tend to increase chlorophyll stores relative to biomass (Dudley et al. ). This suggests increased contributions of the heterotrophic component of epilithon in ponds with endemic canopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be noted that the “AI” is likely to overestimate the contribution of autotrophs to epilithon in shaded ponds, given that algae in lower light tend to increase chlorophyll stores relative to biomass (Dudley et al. ). This suggests increased contributions of the heterotrophic component of epilithon in ponds with endemic canopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Dudley et al. ). Increasing the number of isotope tracers that can be used in food web studies has the potential to improve reliability of mixing models (Fry , , Soto et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main intrinsic factors affecting variability of macroalgal δ 15 N are the preferential mobilization of light isotopes (isotopic fractionation) during uptake, excretion and metabolic reactions (Teichberg et al, 2008) and intra-frond variability (Carballeira et al, 2014;Raimonet et al, 2013;Savage and Elmgren, 2004;Viana et al, in review). External factors are littoral position (Kim et al, 2013) or light (Dudley et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) enhancement of growth rates when supplied with ammonium, no benefit of ammonium over nitrate (e.g., Gracilaria tenuistipitata , Haglund and Pedersen and Ulva pertusa , Dudley et al. ) and even significantly lower growth rates when supplied with ammonium (e.g., Solieria chordalis , Brown ). This variation in response likely stems from the wide range of light, temperature and nutrient concentrations used in these experiments (e.g., ambient light levels [200–700 μmol photons · m −2 · s −1 ] or consistent 12:12 [light:dark] cycles at 55 μmol photons · m −2 · s −1 , see Buschmann et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%