2020
DOI: 10.1111/jvec.12372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of light and kairomone baiting systems on trap collections of biting midges in southern Sweden

Abstract: Effective surveillance is essential for protecting livestock from Culicoides biting midges and the viruses they transmit. The objective of this study was to determine how the baiting system used in traps (UV, incandescent light, incandescent light with CO2, and incandescent light with CO2 and 1‐octen‐3‐ol) influences estimates of midge population abundance, parity, and diel activity. This was achieved through a standardized trapping protocol conducted in three habitats in Sweden. UV light traps caught the most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard Onderstepoort 220‐V fluorescent UV light collected significantly higher numbers than the 12‐V white and 12‐V UV LED traps. These observations confirmed the well‐established greater attractiveness of UV for Culicoides midges compared to either white fluorescent (Venter & Hermanides, 2006) or white incandescent light sources (Rowley & Jorgensen, 1967; Sloyer et al ., 2019; Bray et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard Onderstepoort 220‐V fluorescent UV light collected significantly higher numbers than the 12‐V white and 12‐V UV LED traps. These observations confirmed the well‐established greater attractiveness of UV for Culicoides midges compared to either white fluorescent (Venter & Hermanides, 2006) or white incandescent light sources (Rowley & Jorgensen, 1967; Sloyer et al ., 2019; Bray et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractiveness of UV light, compared to other wavelengths of light, to nocturnal insects is well‐known (Pohe et al ., 2017). The greater attractiveness of UV light was also confirmed for proven biting midge vectors of viruses harmful to livestock such as Culicoides imicola Kieffer (Rowley & Jorgensen, 1967; Venter & Hermanides, 2006; Sloyer et al ., 2019; Bray et al ., 2020). Similarly green light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) were shown to be equal or more attractive than UV light for some species of Culicoides (Bishop et al ., 2006; Harrup et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore development of an effective but safe method is need of hours. Controlling methods by using different baited traps with various semiochemicals or pheromones gaining popularity (Bray et al, 2020) but the most simple method to build a trap is using light which is more cost effective and easy to use for various stored grain insect pests (Abbas et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2019;Meiswinkel and Elbers, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation arises both according to the trap design itself, with variation in size, suction, light source and the type of attractant used (Harrup et al, 2012 , 2016 ; Venter et al, 2015 ). To address this issue, a wide range of studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of different trap designs and attractants in collecting Culicoides across the world in Australia (Bishop et al, 2006 ), Europe (Bray et al, 2020 ), India (Harrup et al, 2016 ), North America (Mullens & Gerry, 1998 ) and South Africa (Venter & Hermanides, 2006 ; Venter et al, 2009 ; Scheffer et al, 2012 ). Systematic comparisons of different attractants using the same trap design platform have been conducted for light wavelength (Bishop et al, 2006 ; Gonzalez et al, 2016 ; Harrup et al, 2016 ; Hope et al, 2015 ) and semiochemicals (Bhasin et al, 2001 ; Harrup et al, 2012 ) and revealed species‐specific responses to these parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%