2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature [15], the smaller the voxel size that is set, the longer the simulation will take. In general, the simulation procedure can be described by a flowchart in a similar way to Bian et al in their research [16], as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature [15], the smaller the voxel size that is set, the longer the simulation will take. In general, the simulation procedure can be described by a flowchart in a similar way to Bian et al in their research [16], as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulation was carried out using the ANSYS code. 85,86 Bian et al 87 investigate the effect of laser power and two scanning techniques (stripe scanning and chessboard scanning) by SLM on the residual stress distribution in 316L steel. The implementation of stripe scanning (rather than chessboard scanning) and an increase in laser power from 160 to 200 W typically increased tensile residual stress in the region of interest.…”
Section: Temperature Field and Thermal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters such as laser power, scanning speed, and powder feed rate significantly impact deformation and part quality. 33,87 In future studies, along with different scanning patterns, optimized process parameters should be implemented to minimize deformation and part quality issues. Some scholars used a laser displacement sensor (LDS) to predict the distortion in AM.…”
Section: Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill yield criterion and von Mises criterion were used in this material model to compare their accuracy with respect to real additive manufactured specimen responses. Hill criterion was anisotropic, independent of hydrostatic pressure, and depended on the orientation of the stress relative to the axis of anisotropy, thus suitable for materials in which the microstructure influences the macroscopic behavior of the material, which is the case for additive manufactured steels [23,24]. Hill yield criterion was, in this study, utilized for the modelling of yield strength anisotropy based on build direction [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%