2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of landscape condition on relative abundance and body condition of two generalist freshwater turtle species

Abstract: Anthropogenic land use changes have altered the structure and function of ecosystems on nearly all parts of the planet (Sala et al., 2000;Zwick, 1992). These alterations often reduce the ability of landscapes to support high biological diversity and decrease the systems' resilience to environmental stressors (i.e., lower their ecological integrity; Freedman, 2015;Ordóñez & Duinker, 2012;Parrish et al., 2003). Much research has been devoted to documenting and quantifying negative impacts of anthropogenic land u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual fitness affects survival and reproduction and is key to understanding population processes in wild animals (Brommer et al, 2004; Link et al, 2002). Body condition, defined broadly as some measure of the energy storage of an individual relative to its structural size (Gosler, 1996; Schulte‐Hostedde et al, 2005), is often used as a proxy for fitness, and can be used to make inferences about individual health and population status (Christiansen, Dawson, et al, 2020; Currie et al, 2021; Gibson et al, 2018; Mota et al, 2021; Mumby et al, 2015; Willems et al, 2021). Through comparisons across time periods, habitats and environmental conditions, studies of body condition have improved our understanding of individual and population‐level responses to environmental change and anthropogenic stressors (Brosset et al, 2015; Phillips et al, 2018; Stirling et al, 1999; Willems et al, 2021; Williams et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual fitness affects survival and reproduction and is key to understanding population processes in wild animals (Brommer et al, 2004; Link et al, 2002). Body condition, defined broadly as some measure of the energy storage of an individual relative to its structural size (Gosler, 1996; Schulte‐Hostedde et al, 2005), is often used as a proxy for fitness, and can be used to make inferences about individual health and population status (Christiansen, Dawson, et al, 2020; Currie et al, 2021; Gibson et al, 2018; Mota et al, 2021; Mumby et al, 2015; Willems et al, 2021). Through comparisons across time periods, habitats and environmental conditions, studies of body condition have improved our understanding of individual and population‐level responses to environmental change and anthropogenic stressors (Brosset et al, 2015; Phillips et al, 2018; Stirling et al, 1999; Willems et al, 2021; Williams et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental and anthropogenic effects on aquatic turtles are often inferred from hoop trap surveys (Hollender and Ligon 2021, Mota et al 2021, Ostovar et al 2021). Using this monitoring method, counts of turtles across survey sites and through time are standardized to a measure of catch per unit effort (CPUE) using trapping effort, which is the product of the number of traps deployed and the number of nights they are set (trap‐nights).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%