2018
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of land use on the trophic niche overlap of dung beetles in the semideciduous Atlantic forest of Argentina

Abstract: 1. The degradation and replacement of natural ecosystems affect species abundance, diversity and interspecific interaction through the modification of resource availability and environmental conditions. Land uses preserving the forest canopy show higher species richness and similarity to the native forest.2. In this study, we explored changes in the trophic niche overlap of dung beetles between the native forest and different land uses in the semideciduous Atlantic forest, under the hypothesis that trophic nic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As we expected, cattle systems preserving canopy cover (silvopastoral systems) also preserved richness and composition of the dung beetle community of the native forest in two distant areas of the humid Chaco region. Consistent with our results, a series of previous studies in tropical and subtropical forests comparing open (pastures) and closed habitats showed that canopy cover was the primary factor determining dung beetle communities (Halffter & Matthews, ; Halffter & Arellano, ; Damborsky et al ., ; De Farias et al ., ; Alvarado et al ., ; Gómez‐Cifuentes et al ., ; Giménez Gómez et al ., ). In our study, silvopastoral systems preserving canopy also preserved microclimatic conditions and vegetation structure from the native forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As we expected, cattle systems preserving canopy cover (silvopastoral systems) also preserved richness and composition of the dung beetle community of the native forest in two distant areas of the humid Chaco region. Consistent with our results, a series of previous studies in tropical and subtropical forests comparing open (pastures) and closed habitats showed that canopy cover was the primary factor determining dung beetle communities (Halffter & Matthews, ; Halffter & Arellano, ; Damborsky et al ., ; De Farias et al ., ; Alvarado et al ., ; Gómez‐Cifuentes et al ., ; Giménez Gómez et al ., ). In our study, silvopastoral systems preserving canopy also preserved microclimatic conditions and vegetation structure from the native forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Within each habitat, we selected three sites (or replicates), separated by a minimum distance of 30 km to increase regional representativeness. In relation to the microclimatic conditions, the native forest and agroforestry parklands show similar temperature at ground level throughout the entire day, whereas open pastures show higher temperature at ground level during the day and similar temperature at ground level during the night 5 (Supplementary Table S1, Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each habitat, we established 10 pitfall traps (3 habitats × 10 traps = 30 traps in total), five baited with omnivorous dung and five with carrion (to attract both coprophagous and necrophagous species). We divided the 24-h period in two periods, based on changes in ground level temperature 5 and the time of sunrise and sunset (data provided by the "Servicio de Hidrografía Naval Argentino"): (1) from 7:00 to 18:00 h and (2) from 18:00 to 7:00 h ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also known that tree vegetation and the presence of native vegetation 37,38 increase the richness of several groups that depend on above-ground vegetation and feed as predators or on pollen 39 or as parasitoids 40 . In silvopastoral systems with Acacia, richness of certain groups was similar to neighbouring native forests 9 and these systems contain greater richness than conventional pastures 41 . Not all groups responded with increases in the silvopasture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%