2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-5187-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of joint geometry and roughness on the multiscale shear behaviour of fractured rock mass using particle flow code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Wang et al [30], the RDFN model considers both the spatial distribution and the geometry of single joint trace, as shown in Figure 2. The DFN model is a discrete fracture model that is based on probability statistical distribution functions and is combined with random seeds and joint density to generate DFN entities that can be used to study two-dimensional [31] or three-dimensional [32,33] rock mass joint models.…”
Section: Rdfn Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Wang et al [30], the RDFN model considers both the spatial distribution and the geometry of single joint trace, as shown in Figure 2. The DFN model is a discrete fracture model that is based on probability statistical distribution functions and is combined with random seeds and joint density to generate DFN entities that can be used to study two-dimensional [31] or three-dimensional [32,33] rock mass joint models.…”
Section: Rdfn Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [30] proposed RDFN models and modelling methods based on three different geometric types, including curves, triangular polylines, and fractal fracture network models. However, each RDFN model only enables the construction of a separate geometric representation function.…”
Section: Rdfn Model Based On Fourier Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only several scholars have considered the influence of joint morphology and conducted direct shear tests. Wang et al [30] and Ma et al [31] studied the effect of joint morphology on shear behavior of joints. Liu and Xia [32] proposed the failure mode of NTJRM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the cost of the physical model test is higher than that of the numerical simulation test. erefore, if the parameters of the simulated material can be determined, many experts and scholars tend to use the numerical simulation test to study the mechanical properties of the incoherent jointed rock mass [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%