2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01390-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of intramolecular hydrogen bond of templates on molecular recognition of molecularly imprinted polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…387 Amongst the basic monomers, 4-vinylpyridine is the most commonly employed, [388][389][390] but other basic monomers such as N,N-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate, 391,392 aminostyrene 393,394 and vinylimidazole 388,395 have also been used. Among the neutral monomers, acrylamide, [396][397][398][399][400][401] vinyl pyrrolidone [402][403][404][405][406][407][408][409] and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) [410][411][412] have all been used. Incorporation of HEMA in methacrylate-based MIPs makes the polymers less hydrophobic which helps in the diffusion of hydrophilic templates.…”
Section: 329mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…387 Amongst the basic monomers, 4-vinylpyridine is the most commonly employed, [388][389][390] but other basic monomers such as N,N-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate, 391,392 aminostyrene 393,394 and vinylimidazole 388,395 have also been used. Among the neutral monomers, acrylamide, [396][397][398][399][400][401] vinyl pyrrolidone [402][403][404][405][406][407][408][409] and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) [410][411][412] have all been used. Incorporation of HEMA in methacrylate-based MIPs makes the polymers less hydrophobic which helps in the diffusion of hydrophilic templates.…”
Section: 329mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of template size on the selectivity of MIPs has been studied, 903 as has the effect of intramolecular H-bonding in the template on its imprint. 401 Allender et al have attempted to explain the observed crossreactivities in binding to MIPs for amino acid derivatives in terms of the ligand structures, 904 and Spivak and Campbell have performed a similar study on amine-imprinted MIPs. 905 The effect of template structure and acidity has been compared in the imprinting of nitrophenol and hydroxybenzoic acid isomers.…”
Section: Recognition and Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FA molecule has a larger size than that of VA; so the specific binding capacity of MIP for FA is lower than for VA. The lower recovery of SA indicates the weak interaction with the binding sites in MIPs, which is probably induced by the intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the carboxylic and the adjacent hydroxyl group in the SA molecular [31].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mip-spe Capacity and Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the crosslinker EDMA (30 mmol) and the initiator AIBN (30.0 mg) were added. The ratios of reagents for the preparation of polymer were taken from [20]. The polymerization was carried out in a water bath at 608C for 24 h. Prepared polymer was passed through a 40-lm sieve, fine particles were removed by flotation in acetone and final product was dried under vacuum at 608C for 1 h. The template was removed from the MIP by Soxhlet extraction with 70 mL of a mixture of methanol/ acetic acid (9 : 1, v/v) for 8 h. Nonimprinted, control polymer (NIP) was prepared and treated in the same manner as MIP but in the absence of template molecule during polymerization.…”
Section: Polymer Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, binding of the molecule of GeA in the specific binding sites of MIP is possible (specific binding capacity of 4.58 lg/g of MIP), probably due to some other interactions between GeA and MIP. The low value of specific binding capacity indicates the weak interaction between GeA and binding sites in MIP, which can be explained by intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the carboxylic group and the adjacent hydroxy group in the GeA molecule [20]. In the case of VA the only difference between the structure of VA and PA is the presence of a methoxy group (in position 3) instead of a hydroxy group.…”
Section: Selectivity Of Mipmentioning
confidence: 99%