2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00739.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of intralaminar cracking on the apparent interlaminar mode I fracture toughness of cross‐ply laminates

Abstract: A B S T R A C T One of the major difficulties in interlaminar fracture tests of multidirectional laminates is the high tendency for intralaminar cracking and the resulting wavy crack propagation. Experimental work showed that this occurred in double cantilever beam (DCB) tests of cross-ply laminates having a starter crack on a 0 • /90 • interface. Moreover, under steadystate propagation conditions, the apparent values of the critical strain energy release rate G Ic were two times higher than those of 0 • /0 • … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LLOYD universal test machine was used to conduct the double cantilever beam (DCB) tests. The mode I critical energy release rate G IC was calculated by the corrected beam theory [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LLOYD universal test machine was used to conduct the double cantilever beam (DCB) tests. The mode I critical energy release rate G IC was calculated by the corrected beam theory [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gradual failure process ends when the energy released equates the critical energy using a mixed mode energetic criterion. Thus, crack propagation was simulated by a linear energetic criterion, which was verified to work quite well during fracture characterisation of composites [16]:…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, both criteria are function of square of relative displacements [21]. Although is an empirical form, it proved to work quite well during fracture characterisation of composites under mode I and mode II [22, 23]. However, it should be noted that under mixed‐mode loading it is advisable to perform a previous calibration for the material being simulated.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%