Influence of Internet and Social Media in the Promotion of Alternative Oncology, Cancer Quackery, and the Predatory Publishing Phenomenon

Abstract

In the last decade, electronic media has irrupted physician’s clinical practice. Patients increasingly use Internet and social media to obtain enormous amounts of unsupervised data about cancer. Blogs, social networking sites, online support groups and forums are useful channels for medical education and experience sharing but also perfect environments for misinformation, quackery, violation of privacy and lack of professionalism. The widespread availability of such electronic resources allows some followers of the alternative oncology to spread useless irrational and controversial remedies for cancer, like false medicaments, miraculous diets, electronic devices, and even psychic therapies, as did charlatans in the past, providing false expectations about cancer treatments. Moreover, so-called predatory journals have introduced confusion and malpractice within the academic biomedical publishing system. This is a rising editorial phenomenon affecting all fields of biomedicine, including oncology that jeopardizes the quality of scientific contribution and damages the image of open access publication.

Needs, preferences, and experiences of adult cancer survivors in accessing dietary information post‐treatment: A scoping review

“…Improving access to dietary information within healthcare settings is a priority because participants in the included studies frequently reported difficulty identifying credible nutrition information beyond the healthcare context. This may have implications for the quality of information accessed, particularly when seeking information about complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) (Delgado‐Lopez and Corrales‐Garcia 2018). In this review, cancer survivors identified social networks and online materials as key references for nutrition‐related CAM information.…”

Age-related differences in social media use in the neurosurgical community: A multi-institutional study

“…15,20–22 However, with this increased social media use (on both sides – by researchers and healthcare professionals as well as patients alike), some worry about the spread of false information, both in terms of medicine and provider ratings. 23 Luckily, Donnally et al found that although spine surgeons with a social media presence had more ratings and comments on online physician rating systems (Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, and Google.com), their scores were not correlated with social media presence. 24 Overall, this suggests that social media seems to be positively impacting the outreach and engagement of hospitals, individual surgeons, and patients alike.…”

Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools

“…Despite the initial positive experience of appointing social media editors to promote journal articles,8990 related social communication activities are still not thoroughly controlled by journal editors and publishers. In such a scenario, biased and misleading comments may find their way to the online platforms, leading to unintentional and intentional damages to scholarly outputs 919293. Skewed opinion polls and geographically disproportionate online activities can also negatively affect post-publication communication, particularly because of the active use of Twitter and other powerful social platforms by scholars in developed countries and passive stance of those in developing countries 9495…”