2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of intermittent wetting and drying conditions on heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blecken et al 2009b;Davis et al 2001;Muthanna et al 2007a). Thus, the high metal removal in the top layer indicates that the biofilters in the study at hand produced reliable results and that the metals do not ingress deeply into the filter, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Blecken et al 2009b;Davis et al 2001;Muthanna et al 2007a). Thus, the high metal removal in the top layer indicates that the biofilters in the study at hand produced reliable results and that the metals do not ingress deeply into the filter, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it was not possible to estimate the total plant dry mass in the filters and thus a detailed mass balance could not be conducted. Nevertheless, the comparison of the metal masses in plant shoots and roots and the filter media allows an overview of the metal fate: it follows from other biofilter studies that the filter media account for the main share of the removal, even if the concentration in plants is higher (Blecken et al 2009b;Davis et al 2001Davis et al , 2003Muthanna et al 2007a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Infiltration based stormwater options aim to restore/mimic pre-development conditions [5] by reducing runoff volumes, trapping sediments, and mitigating peak flow rates. In some cases, infiltration based systems are also designed to remove dissolved contaminants by adding a specific adsorbent layer [6], or relying on combined effects of plants and soils-bioretention [7]. Heavy metals are found in urban runoff from multiple nonpoint sources such as vehicle components wear, exhaust emissions, lubricants, and galvanized elements along roads, among others [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dryness may affect soil structure (e.g., porosity increase and cracking occurrence) and plant activity, including removal effi ciency of heavy metals [16]. Although the literature [17] showed that short-term dryness had no effect on heavy metal removal, effl uent heavy metal concentration increases after three weeks; in the case of a submerged area and carbon source, however, even if the dry period had been extended, Cu and Pb still maintained the best removal rates.…”
Section: Rainfall Time Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%