2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of interfacial friction and specimen configuration in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing Figures 29 and 30, it can be seen that the effective strain of the cylindrical specimen was higher at the center, while the effective strain of the cubic specimen was higher at the two end faces in contact with the bars. This difference between cylindrical and cubic specimens is similar to the findings in Reference [37]. As shown for the contours of the cylindrical specimen in Figure 40, the effective stress, effective strain, and damage degree were higher at the center than at the two end faces in contact with the bars.…”
Section: Damage Kineticssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing Figures 29 and 30, it can be seen that the effective strain of the cylindrical specimen was higher at the center, while the effective strain of the cubic specimen was higher at the two end faces in contact with the bars. This difference between cylindrical and cubic specimens is similar to the findings in Reference [37]. As shown for the contours of the cylindrical specimen in Figure 40, the effective stress, effective strain, and damage degree were higher at the center than at the two end faces in contact with the bars.…”
Section: Damage Kineticssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, many studies on UHMWPE laminate mainly focused on the out-of-plane direction; the in-plane properties were not explored as carefully as for other fiber composites [17,18]. In addition, the size and the shape of the specimen had an influence on the dynamic properties in many studies [7,[36][37][38]. Thus, the effect of size and shape with regard to UHMWPE laminate should also be explored [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the SHPB bars have the same crosssectional area and are made of the same, homogeneous material [12]. Let Ay and Ey be the cross-sectional area and elastic modulus of bars, respectively, Cy be the velocity of stress pulse wave, and As and ls be the cross-sectional area and length of the specimen, respectively.…”
Section: Figure 4 Stress Wave Propagation Between Specimen and Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Compression using a sandwich specimen (Zhong et al, 2015) and shear tests (Rusinek and Klepaczko, 2001;Bao and Wierzbicki, 2004) also reports for this material but it is out of scope of this analysis.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%