1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0007485300041377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of intercropping on the abundance, distribution and parasitism of Chilo spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs

Abstract: Two of the most common and serious pests of maize and sorghum in the coastal areas of East Africa are the pyralid species, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) and C. orichalcociliellus (Strand). Maize monocrop (with high and low plant density) and maize/cowpea mixed intercrop field experiments were conducted in Kenya to test if intercropping decreased the number of egg batches laid, altered the distribution of the egg batches and influenced egg parasitism. There was no significant difference in the number of egg batches… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these intercropping studies did not seek to determine the underlying mechanisms behind the effect of intercropping on stem borer population levels. Intercropping maize with cowpea was an effective way of reducing damage caused by C. partellus larvae migrating from neighboring plants (146,148). This finding was confirmed by the reports that 30% of C. partellus oviposition in maize/sorghum/cowpea-intercropping systems was on cowpea, and the number of larvae reaching host plants from cowpea decreased with distance (15,16).…”
Section: Intercropping and Habitat Managementmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these intercropping studies did not seek to determine the underlying mechanisms behind the effect of intercropping on stem borer population levels. Intercropping maize with cowpea was an effective way of reducing damage caused by C. partellus larvae migrating from neighboring plants (146,148). This finding was confirmed by the reports that 30% of C. partellus oviposition in maize/sorghum/cowpea-intercropping systems was on cowpea, and the number of larvae reaching host plants from cowpea decreased with distance (15,16).…”
Section: Intercropping and Habitat Managementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Studies in Kenya have concentrated both on the practice of intercropping cowpea with maize and sorghum and on the ways in which the developed systems could be adopted by small-scale farmers in eastern Africa (16,138,148,162). Most concluded that intercropping reduced the incidence of stem borers.…”
Section: Intercropping and Habitat Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She concluded that particular vegetational associations can enhance natural enemy activity, although the role of single-species effects can be obscured by a focus on diversity and these enhancement effects do not apply to all natural enemies (Letourneau, 1987). In a study of maize monocrop and maize-cowpea intercrop field experiments in Kenya, Pats et al (1997) found no change in oviposition behaviour of the herbivore pests (Chilo spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)), but did find increased egg parasitism in the intercrops, Abundance of an important ground-dwelling predator Pterostichus melanarius Illiger (Coleoptera: Carabidae) was found to be greater in a barley-pea (Hordeum vulgare-Pisum sativum) intercrop than in monocultures of barley, pea, bean (Vicia faba) or fescue (Festuca rubra); the authors attributed the preference shown by the beetles to both visual and chemical cues from the intercrop (Caracamo & Spence, 1994).…”
Section: Mixed Cropping and Intercroppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oviposition preference may also be influenced by early adult experience (T raynier , 1984; J aenike , 1990; V et and P apaj , 1992; T urlings et al., 1993), as experience on a previous host may affect fertility on a subsequent host (J aenike , 1990; C unningham et al., 1998). Other factors influencing oviposition preference are competition for oviposition sites (R othschild and S choonhoven , 1977; W ood , 1982; F inch and J ones , 1987; J aenike , 1990; T hompson and P ellmyr , 1991; D icke , 2000), the presence or absence of natural enemies (R oot , 1973; A ndow , 1991; P ropoky and L ewis , 1993; O hsaki and S ato , 1994; D icke , 2000), and distribution of potential host plants (W iklund , 1982; S tanton , 1983; A ndow , 1991; M c L ain , 1992; P äts et al., 1997). Females are likely to discover or encounter large host plant patches sooner than small patches (S outhwood , 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%