2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of institutional differences on trade credit use during pandemics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of COVID‐19, most of the literature examined the impact of a pandemic on the financial stability of a single country/region using less than 3 years of microdata (Cicchiello et al, 2022; Elnahass et al, 2021), while this study calculates the probability of firm default in 43 countries or regions around the world from a micro perspective using the option value method proposed by Merton (1974) and the conditional probability of default proposed by Lee et al (2011). Following Wang et al (2013), this article measures the level of pandemic crisis in each country or region based on the frequency of exposure to the five post‐war epidemic crises SARS (2003), H1N1 (2009), MERS (2012), Ebola (2014), and Zika (2016) identified by Jamison (2018) Disease Control Priorities and Zheng et al (2023). The results of this article provide significant evidence that firms operating in a country that suffers from a higher frequency of pandemic crises are more likely to default.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of COVID‐19, most of the literature examined the impact of a pandemic on the financial stability of a single country/region using less than 3 years of microdata (Cicchiello et al, 2022; Elnahass et al, 2021), while this study calculates the probability of firm default in 43 countries or regions around the world from a micro perspective using the option value method proposed by Merton (1974) and the conditional probability of default proposed by Lee et al (2011). Following Wang et al (2013), this article measures the level of pandemic crisis in each country or region based on the frequency of exposure to the five post‐war epidemic crises SARS (2003), H1N1 (2009), MERS (2012), Ebola (2014), and Zika (2016) identified by Jamison (2018) Disease Control Priorities and Zheng et al (2023). The results of this article provide significant evidence that firms operating in a country that suffers from a higher frequency of pandemic crises are more likely to default.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%