2016 8th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icumt.2016.7765401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of input power backoff of nonlinear power amplifier on ber performance of optimal SEFDM signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the distortion introduced in the transmit signal by an LS-MIMO transmitter is mainly caused by radio frequency (RF) impairments, such as in-phase/quadrature-phase imbalance, crosstalk, and, predominantly, by high power amplifier (HPA) nonlinearity, especially when HPAs operate close to saturation [14], [17], [18]. Conventionally, applying a large back-off from the saturation power of a PA has been considered as a solution for decreasing the nonlinear distortion since reducing the transmit power allows the PAs to operate in their linear operating region [19]. A serious disadvantage of this solution is that backing off from the saturation level causes PAs to work less energy efficiently, because the PA's ability to generate RF energy decreases when operating away from the saturation point [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the distortion introduced in the transmit signal by an LS-MIMO transmitter is mainly caused by radio frequency (RF) impairments, such as in-phase/quadrature-phase imbalance, crosstalk, and, predominantly, by high power amplifier (HPA) nonlinearity, especially when HPAs operate close to saturation [14], [17], [18]. Conventionally, applying a large back-off from the saturation power of a PA has been considered as a solution for decreasing the nonlinear distortion since reducing the transmit power allows the PAs to operate in their linear operating region [19]. A serious disadvantage of this solution is that backing off from the saturation level causes PAs to work less energy efficiently, because the PA's ability to generate RF energy decreases when operating away from the saturation point [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the research on the nonlinearity of power amplifier is concerned, considerable amount of studies 28–32 focused on the nonlinear effects of field effect transistor (FET) with a total power approaching saturation in order to provide the circuit design and quality improvement with ample solutions of predistortion techniques and equalization algorithms. Firstly proposed by Saleh 33 and widely adopted by many researchers, 34,35 analytical model of nonlinearity in traveling wave tube has benefited qualitative evaluation of its influence on constellation dispersion, bit error rate, and spectrum distribution, whereas regretfully still that those works were regarded as the reference for the structural design optimization to improve the communication quality as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A marked contribution of improving spectral efficiency was proposed in 1975 by Mazo [1], where it was proven that, in a single-carrier scenario, a 25% gain in spectral efficiency can be achieved at the same bit error rate (BER) and energy per bit (E b ). In 2003, a multi-carrier system, termed spectrally efficient frequency division multiplexing (SEFDM) [2], [3], which improves spectral efficiency by getting the sub-carriers closer while compromising the orthogonality compared to orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) was reported and shown to have advantages in achieving capacity gains [4], [5], choice of signal shapes and power levels [6], [7] and in coexisting with other systems [8]. Other techniques were proposed to improve spectral efficiency by suppressing the out-of-band power level, such as; generalized frequency di-T. Xu, H. Ghannam vision multiplexing (GFDM) [9], filterbank based multicarrier (FBMC) [10] and universal-filtered multi-carrier (UFMC) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%