1986
DOI: 10.1016/0883-2897(86)90108-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of initial large dose on subsequent uptake of therapeutic radioiodine in thyroid cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical studies indicate that stunning is a prolonged effect lasting for many days (1,3,6,7,36). This finding was confirmed in the present study, in which no signs of recovery of the suppressed iodide transport were observed in cultures exposed to 131 I or 99m Tc up to 1 wk after the irradiation period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical studies indicate that stunning is a prolonged effect lasting for many days (1,3,6,7,36). This finding was confirmed in the present study, in which no signs of recovery of the suppressed iodide transport were observed in cultures exposed to 131 I or 99m Tc up to 1 wk after the irradiation period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that radiation-induced loss of iodide transport develops gradually and rather slowly after the NIS gene transcription is significantly suppressed. Moreover, these in vitro findings support the many clinical reports of a delay in detection of stunning until several days after the administration of radioiodine for diagnostic purposes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)36,37).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It had been reported that administration of 2-5mCi of diagnostic radioactive iodine 131 (RI131) deliver absorbed doses of 4-38 and 10-58Gy to thyroid remnants [14,15] . Medvedec 200516 added that absorbed doses >4Gy might result in thyroid stunning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also realized that the dose to the metastases regrettably was B/10% of the intended dose. In a search of the literature we found Jeevanram et al's work from 1986 clearly describing the phenomenon of stunning [15]. After this incident we became very cautious, using low activities of 131 I or, alternatively, using the gamma emitter 123 I or simply avoiding diagnostic scans.…”
Section: Stunningmentioning
confidence: 99%