1990
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90018-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of initial forearm position on premotor times (PMTs) of the biceps brachii during an elbow flexion task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O n the right-hand side in Fig. The EMG activity of several muscles acting on the shoulder angle also varied in a linear fashion with position of the upper limb (Furubayashi & Kasai, 1990). 1, i.e., the torque effect differs and is the largest at a smaller angle of shoulder abduction.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…O n the right-hand side in Fig. The EMG activity of several muscles acting on the shoulder angle also varied in a linear fashion with position of the upper limb (Furubayashi & Kasai, 1990). 1, i.e., the torque effect differs and is the largest at a smaller angle of shoulder abduction.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3B shows records of a single step-tracking movement associated with bursts of activity in the anterior deltoid (agonist) and the posterior deltoid (antagonist) muscles from different initial angles of shoulder abduction. The EMG activity of several muscles acting on the shoulder angle also varied in a linear fashion with position of the upper limb (Furubayashi & Kasai, 1990). However, we did not observe remarkable EMG changes in the pectoralis major and the latissimus dorsi in accordance with different initial angles of shoulder abduction (not dustrated, but see EMG recordings of left side in Fig.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RT of the EMG burst was affected by arm position (Furubayashi & Kasai, 1990), and the MEP amplitude in the hand muscles was affected by forearm position (Mitsuhashi, Seki, Akamatsu, & Handa, 2007), indicating that proprioceptive afferent feedback affects excitability of the motor system. However, corticospinal excitability in the hand muscles decreased during eye movement with visual occlusion irrespective of the forearm position in the present study.…”
Section: Proprioceptive Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During normal limb position changes, the ensemble of spindles within a muscle dynamically signals a slight distortion of muscle length (13). Furthermore, limb position changes prior to voluntary movement affect the combination of agonist/antagonist muscles involved in the activity and the order in which they are activated (14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%