2014
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of initial conditions on granular dynamics near the jamming transition

Abstract: In this paper, we compare the behaviours of two vibrofluidized granular systems, identical in terms of their composition, geometry and driving parameters, differing only in their initial conditions. It is found that, by increasing the strength with which a system is initially excited, considerable differences in system composition and dynamics persist even after the driving is returned to its typical value. The observed changes in particle mobility and packing density are shown to result in marked differences … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the continued close correspondence observed between experiment and simulation for the (lower density) 15 particle case, where the system is unlikely to experience inelastic collapse, strongly suggests that the contact models used, and the relevant parameters chosen, are indeed adequate to emulate the experimental situation. Further support for the validity of the simulations used is provided by the consistent accuracy with which this model has been shown to capture the behaviour of similar experimental systems in previous studies, where the strongly driven, low density beds explored exist far from the limit of inelastic collapse [57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Discrete Particle Simulations-mercurydpmsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the continued close correspondence observed between experiment and simulation for the (lower density) 15 particle case, where the system is unlikely to experience inelastic collapse, strongly suggests that the contact models used, and the relevant parameters chosen, are indeed adequate to emulate the experimental situation. Further support for the validity of the simulations used is provided by the consistent accuracy with which this model has been shown to capture the behaviour of similar experimental systems in previous studies, where the strongly driven, low density beds explored exist far from the limit of inelastic collapse [57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Discrete Particle Simulations-mercurydpmsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…once agreement between experiment and simulation has been demonstrated) using the known, experimental ε values, it is then possible to investigate the specific influence of ε by changing this particular parameter whilst holding all other variables fixed at the values known to successfully reproduce the experimental situation. The frictional coefficient is taken as μ = 0.1 [38], a value previously shown to provide accurate results in similar systems [57], and the contact time, t c , is implemented as 10 −6 s. The appropriateness of our chosen t c value was confirmed by performing repeated runs using values of t c a factor of 10 above and below this value and ensuring consistency in the resultant data.…”
Section: Discrete Particle Simulations-mercurydpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental domain is bounded by six solid walls. For both particles and walls, the frictional coefficient is taken as 0.1 m = , a value which has been shown to accurately reproduce experimental results in vibrated systems using the same software employed here [70,71]. The implementation of this value of μ also adds to the generality of our results, as a number of easily available materials which are commonly used in experiment (for example glass, steel, acrylic) share a similar friction coefficient of 0.1 m~ [72].…”
Section: The Simulated Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these systems, the relevant parameter determining mean flux through the orifice is the maximum velocity of the vibrating motion [7,8]. In vibrated beds of particles, jamming behaviors are typically history dependent [9] with the nonlinear response of the system dominated by contact-breaking due to the purely repulsive interaction between grains [10]. Under shear, the stress in both vibrated and non-vibrated granular materials is non-monotonic as a function of strain rate, with vibration reducing static shear strength, while still exhibiting history dependence for relatively high vibrations [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%