2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of industrial solid waste as filling material on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of cementitious backfills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baotou is one of the pilot WFCs in Inner Mongolia, China. Moreover, FA and gypsum are the two main types of solid waste in Baotou [11]. Thus, the utilization of SWs has become a hot research topic in this city.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baotou is one of the pilot WFCs in Inner Mongolia, China. Moreover, FA and gypsum are the two main types of solid waste in Baotou [11]. Thus, the utilization of SWs has become a hot research topic in this city.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that crushed waste oyster shells replaced 30% of the fine aggregate, and 30% of the cement was replaced by fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag to obtain the mortar with the best performance. Li et al [10] studied the feasibility of industrial solid wastes (fly ash, desulfurization gypsum, steel slag) as mineral filler materials through experiments, which solved the environmental risks caused by industrial solid waste and reduced the cost of cement-based cementitious materials. Ju et al [11] proposed a precipitation-solvent extraction-leaching process, which can effectively separate and recover titanium, scandium, and iron in acidic wastewater and realize the resource utilization of red gypsum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some clear differences between CPB, mortar and concrete (Benzaazoua et al, 2004). Fresh and hardened characteristics of CPB is quite different from those of mortar and concrete (Li et al, 2021). This means that the amount of the water used within CPB is far more than the chemical binding capability of OPC within CPB, thereby leading to slow acquisition in the strength and low strength, especially for early ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%