1977
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(77)90782-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of incident light wavelength on time jitter of fast photomultipliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extraction field at the cathode is very weak and consequently photoelectrons produced by blue light (hc/ λ~ 3 eV) do not focus on to d 1 in the same way as do photoelectrons with less initial energy. Moszynski and Vacher (1977), have shown that the transit time dispersion is wavelength dependent, thereby supporting the aforementioned. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the inner surface of the window, the inner wall of the glass envelope between the window and d 1 and the first dynode itself are all photosensitive.…”
Section: Sources Of Small Pulsessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The extraction field at the cathode is very weak and consequently photoelectrons produced by blue light (hc/ λ~ 3 eV) do not focus on to d 1 in the same way as do photoelectrons with less initial energy. Moszynski and Vacher (1977), have shown that the transit time dispersion is wavelength dependent, thereby supporting the aforementioned. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the inner surface of the window, the inner wall of the glass envelope between the window and d 1 and the first dynode itself are all photosensitive.…”
Section: Sources Of Small Pulsessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This increases the number of photoelectrons and improves the time resolution. However, a cut-off of the PC sensitivity at longer wavelengths affects the time jitter because of a larger initial velocity of released photoelectrons [9].…”
Section: Outline Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The venetian blind structure, although effective as an electron multiplier, introduces an uncertainty in the time and pulse height response of the PM. This uncertainty is about 2 ns in time and 10-30% in pulse height for single photon interactions [8]. Measurements show that PM time jitter at one pe illumination is asymmetrically distributed with a fwhm of 10-11 ns (4-5 ns standard deviation about the peak with a tail extending out to 40 ns beyond the peak).…”
Section: The Photomultiplier Tubementioning
confidence: 96%