2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-08885-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of imidacloprid on bacterial community diversity of mango orchard soil assessed through 16S rRNA sequencing-based metagenomic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that research on the effects of neonicotinoids on soil microorganisms has produced conflicting results. Some studies did not find any adverse effects of neonicotinoids on microorganisms (Garg et al, 2021;Li et al, 2018;Parizadeh et al, 2021;Singh & Singh, 2005a;Zhang et al, 2015), while some found significant changes in the microbial community in terms of relative abundance (Garg et al, 2021;Parizadeh et al, 2021;Streletskii et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2018), diversity and structure (Cai et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2021;Yamaguchi et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2021) and enzymatic activity (Cai et al, 2016a;Castillo Diaz et al, 2017;Filimon et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2014). Such contradictory results may be because some authors investigated only eukaryotes, some only prokaryotes, and others a combination of the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found that research on the effects of neonicotinoids on soil microorganisms has produced conflicting results. Some studies did not find any adverse effects of neonicotinoids on microorganisms (Garg et al, 2021;Li et al, 2018;Parizadeh et al, 2021;Singh & Singh, 2005a;Zhang et al, 2015), while some found significant changes in the microbial community in terms of relative abundance (Garg et al, 2021;Parizadeh et al, 2021;Streletskii et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2018), diversity and structure (Cai et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2021;Yamaguchi et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2021) and enzymatic activity (Cai et al, 2016a;Castillo Diaz et al, 2017;Filimon et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2014). Such contradictory results may be because some authors investigated only eukaryotes, some only prokaryotes, and others a combination of the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Out of 29 selected studies, only five (17%) found no or very limited significant adverse effects on the relative abundance and diversity of microbial populations, some of which are responsible for the biodegradation of neonicotinoids from the neonicotinoids in question (imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam) (Garg et al, 2021;Li et al, 2018;Parizadeh et al, 2021;Singh & Singh, 2005a;Zhang et al, 2015). PLFA, PCR-DGGE and CLPP approaches used by Cyco n et al ( 2013) revealed that imidacloprid applied at field rate had a negligible impact on the community structure and biodiversity of native soil microorganisms.…”
Section: Neonicotinoid Studies That Reported No Adverse Effect On The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on biosurfactant producing microbes has been limited to soil isolates, primarily from the Pseudomonas and Bacillus species. However, with the help of metagenomics, it has recently been discovered that a diverse group of soil and marine microbes can produce biosurfactants ( Dhanjal and Sharma, 2018 ; Guerra et al, 2018 ; Garg et al, 2021 ) and some of these biosurfactants have shown potential in bioremediation of pesticides ( Kennedy et al, 2011 ; Ghosh and Das, 2018 ). These microbes include Azotobacter chroococcum, Cobelia species, Myroides species, Nocardiopsis alba MSA10, Alcanivorax species, Micrococcus luteus, Yarrowia lipolytica .…”
Section: Metagenomics: Unraveling the Structure And Composition Of Biosurfactant Producing Microbes And Their Role In Pesticide Remediatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easily accepted in the environment due to its simple operation, wide applicability, low cost, and contaminant destruction by converting pesticides into non-toxic metabolites, microbial bioremediation would reduce the detrimental impacts of pesticides on soil microflora and fauna, improving land safety. Soil microorganisms have been shown to degrade imidacloprid in several studies [12]. Furthermore, several research indicates that soil microbes can degrade imidacloprid [6,13] and several pure microorganism isolates, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa [14] and P. mosselii strain NG1 [15] are discovered to breakdown imidacloprid on their own .Hydrocarbons and other of pesticides groups could bioremediation via Enterobacter sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%