2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hysteresis on groundwater wave dynamics in an unconfined aquifer with a sloping boundary

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Jazayeri Shoushtari, S.M.H., Cartwright, N., Perrochet, P., Nielsen, P., Influence of hysteresis on groundwater wave dynamics in an unconfined aquifer with a sloping boundary, Journal of Hydrology (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.020 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8) for K=60 m/d and z=20 m (best fit of infinite-order theory to observations, see Section 3.5) fall within 1 standard deviation of the observed values for both storms and tides. The intermediate aquifer estimates do not account for hysteresis, which could cause reduced amplitude attenuation and phase lag evolution with increasing period (Cartwright, 2014;Shoushtari et al, 2015;Werner & Lockington, 2003), crudely consistent with the observations. However, analytical theories including hysteresis (or capillarity) (Shoushtari et al, 2016) predict larger ratios of real to imaginary wavenumbers than those estimated from the observations (circles in Figure 3.6), and dispersion relationships (curves in Figure 3.6) that include hysteresis and capillary effects (not shown) would result in poorer agreement with the observations for the specified hydrogeologic parameters.…”
Section: Observational Estimates Of Cross-shore Propagation and Verti...supporting
confidence: 75%
“…8) for K=60 m/d and z=20 m (best fit of infinite-order theory to observations, see Section 3.5) fall within 1 standard deviation of the observed values for both storms and tides. The intermediate aquifer estimates do not account for hysteresis, which could cause reduced amplitude attenuation and phase lag evolution with increasing period (Cartwright, 2014;Shoushtari et al, 2015;Werner & Lockington, 2003), crudely consistent with the observations. However, analytical theories including hysteresis (or capillarity) (Shoushtari et al, 2016) predict larger ratios of real to imaginary wavenumbers than those estimated from the observations (circles in Figure 3.6), and dispersion relationships (curves in Figure 3.6) that include hysteresis and capillary effects (not shown) would result in poorer agreement with the observations for the specified hydrogeologic parameters.…”
Section: Observational Estimates Of Cross-shore Propagation and Verti...supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Werner and Lockington, 2003;Cartwright et al, 2005) and (b) why modelled hysteresis appears to have little effect on the dispersion of watertable waves (cf. Shoushtari et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such phenomenal has also been shown in the Figure 10 of the paper of Shoushtari et al . (), that the moisture–pressure loops moved left along the propagation direction. Correspondingly, the value of α in Equation varies.…”
Section: Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(, ) showed better precision compared with traditional Boussinesq models when applied in simulating the wave or tidal induced groundwater wave, the coefficients adopted in the revised models often deviate much away from the actual ones. Some studies have attributed such discrepancy to hysteresis effect, which results in moisture asymmetry during the alternative drying and wetting processes (Stauffer and Kinzelbach, ; Cartwright, ; Shoushtari et al ., ). Furthermore, hysteresis effect has been taken into account in numerical models based on Richard's equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%