2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hydrodynamic drag model on shear stress in the simulation of magnetorheological fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of their model were (i) the small size of simulated boxes, (ii) that magnetic particles were modeled as magnetic dipoles and (iii) that there was force coupling from the fluid on the particles but not vice versa. This particle-fluid coupling was studied together with the influence of the particular hydrodynamic drag force in Lagger et al 181 They investigated three models: a DEM with Stokes drag law for the hydrodynamic interaction and two coupled DEM smoothed particle hydrodynamics models with drag laws from Stokes and Dallavalle/Di Felice, respectively. Currently, this work serves as a useful guideline for the choice of the hydrodynamic interaction model in particle-based MRF simulations.…”
Section: Review Soft Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of their model were (i) the small size of simulated boxes, (ii) that magnetic particles were modeled as magnetic dipoles and (iii) that there was force coupling from the fluid on the particles but not vice versa. This particle-fluid coupling was studied together with the influence of the particular hydrodynamic drag force in Lagger et al 181 They investigated three models: a DEM with Stokes drag law for the hydrodynamic interaction and two coupled DEM smoothed particle hydrodynamics models with drag laws from Stokes and Dallavalle/Di Felice, respectively. Currently, this work serves as a useful guideline for the choice of the hydrodynamic interaction model in particle-based MRF simulations.…”
Section: Review Soft Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation is generally adopted because of computational reasons. Also, a recent study by Lagger et al 2015 demonstrated that hydrodynamic interactions can be safely neglected if the hydrodynamic stress is not the main contribution to the total stress. Considering these approximations, the equation of motion of a particle i , can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Simulation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the two-way coupling between DEM and SPH based on a local averaging technique was proposed by Gao and Herbst [16], Sun et al [23] and Robinson et al [24]. The successful application of the two-way coupled DEM-SPH to slurry flow, abrasive wear and magnetorheological fluids was demonstrated by Cleary [25], Beck & Eberhard [26] and Lagger et al [27] respectively. A detailed analysis of the sedimentation of one particle and a porous block presented in [24] and a comparative study on coupling the DEM with meshbased methods and DEM coupling with the mesh-less SPH method reported by Markauskas et al [28] allow to conclude, that DEM-SPH is an appropriate and promising tool for modelling particle-laden fluid systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%