1999
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Histologic Type and Age on Survival Rates for Invasive Cervical Carcinoma in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
42
2
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
42
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, lead-time bias will increase age in early stages and decrease age in advanced stages if advancing stages are expected due to aggressive behaviour of the tumor [13]. Thirdly, if survival depends on age it may do so differentially according to tumor type [20]. Due to design and the limited number of women we cannot exclude these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, lead-time bias will increase age in early stages and decrease age in advanced stages if advancing stages are expected due to aggressive behaviour of the tumor [13]. Thirdly, if survival depends on age it may do so differentially according to tumor type [20]. Due to design and the limited number of women we cannot exclude these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, the time of diagnosis may be influenced by changing incidences as adenocarcinoma is increasing over time, presumably due to increased use of hormonal anticonception [6,7,20]. Secondly, lead-time bias will increase age in early stages and decrease age in advanced stages if advancing stages are expected due to aggressive behaviour of the tumor [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient age has also been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in cases of cervical cancer, with a decrease in recurrence rate and an increase in survival rate associated with advanced age (Turan et al, 2010). However, other studies have indicated that a younger age is an advantage for survival (Chen et al, 1999;Bulk et al, 2003) and that age has not any prognostic value on survival rate (Ho et al, 2004;Behtash et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have provided discrepant results. 9,11,18,19,21,22,25,27,29,35,39 This may be due to the inclusion of histologic groups of patient with adenosquamous carcinoma 11,22,25 or clear cell carcinoma 11 in the other studies or to the use of different grading systems. 9,25,35 When comparing the prognosis for patients with glandular and nonglandular carcinomas of the uterine cervix, several authors have found inferior survival for patients with glandular tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,25,35 When comparing the prognosis for patients with glandular and nonglandular carcinomas of the uterine cervix, several authors have found inferior survival for patients with glandular tumors. 3,5,10,23,26,34,36,39,40 Because of these differences, speculations have been made on the relevance of a similar grading system for patients with glandular and nonglandular carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Glandular tumors of the uterine cervix may have more in common with endometrial carcinomas than with cervical SCCs, and their biologic properties may not be reflected in a staging system based on tumors that arise from the squamous epithelium in the distal part of the organ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%